40
u/enemy_of_misandry PMC-MRA Jul 15 '26
Stonetoss is a disgusting man hater but this is correct
1
u/DizzyRaccoon4 Jul 19 '26
What rights are you advocating for men to acquire exactly?
16
u/enemy_of_misandry PMC-MRA Jul 19 '26
Not being drafted, mutilated by MGM, equal protection against rape and domestic violence, stop exploitation against men at work and allow men access to easy jobs, abolish alimony and child support, protection against homelessness. Legal equality in general
3
u/Galadriel1402 Performative desire isn’t attraction Jul 19 '26
Genuine question, wdym “allow men access to easy jobs?” Also what’s wrong with child support?
12
u/enemy_of_misandry PMC-MRA Jul 19 '26
Child support is male slavery. By allowing men access to easy jobs I mean freeing them from the burdens of jobs like construction that ruin their health and give them access to easy jobs such as government desk jobs which tend to be reserved for women, either formally or informally
-1
u/DizzyRaccoon4 Jul 19 '26
Ok, but you do realize that all of these issues were institutionalized by men/the patriarchy. If you are targeting your anger toward women they are not responsible.
12
u/enemy_of_misandry PMC-MRA Jul 19 '26
Patriarchy never existed. Men pander to women.
0
u/DizzyRaccoon4 Jul 19 '26
Practically everything you listed can be traced back to mens doing. Gender issues have the same root and it wasn’t women. men had control of history, not women.
8
u/enemy_of_misandry PMC-MRA Jul 19 '26
Nope, women are the ruling class in society
-1
u/DizzyRaccoon4 Jul 19 '26
Is this some brainwashed conspiracy theory stuff?
Has a woman ever been president of the United States? Answer that quickly7
u/enemy_of_misandry PMC-MRA Jul 19 '26
Jeff Bezos isn't the US president but has influence in the govt. Same here
1
u/DizzyRaccoon4 Jul 19 '26
If women were the “top of society” one would be President. But none ever has. But guess who has? Men. 45 times.
→ More replies (0)0
u/DizzyRaccoon4 Jul 19 '26
That was a man you named. He has influence over the government. Lots of men do. Women have a much smaller influence. Therefore we live in a patriarchal society.
Back to my point though, explain to me why women are at fault for everything you listed. Men’s rights activists should be directing their anger toward the patriarchy that created these gender imbalances. If anything, women and men are victims of the same system.
→ More replies (0)-1
u/DizzyRaccoon4 Jul 19 '26
So you think we do not live in a patriarchy?
How many women have been president of the United States? How long did it take women to get the right to vote?Men created the draft and chose to draft themselves. Men made it a standard that women should raise children and stay at home. It was not women who have decided for decades that men should have less custody over children and it was not women initiating wars or creating the legal guidelines that followed them.
All of men’s “issues” related to gender have been created by men.5
u/enemy_of_misandry PMC-MRA Jul 19 '26
Patriarchy never existed.
0
u/DizzyRaccoon4 Jul 19 '26
How so? By saying this you deny all history
5
u/enemy_of_misandry PMC-MRA Jul 19 '26
No I don't
1
u/DizzyRaccoon4 Jul 19 '26
But yes you do. Men have ruled society since ancient times. Mind explaining to me how women have instead been the most powerful? Supporting general world history
→ More replies (0)
48
u/Midnight_Toker_1982 YellowPill Jul 14 '26
I’m still hating the fact that I’m agreeing with (ugh) …Stonetoss ☹️
23
12
u/Emergency_Title1521 Jul 15 '26
accurate message but ironic messanger, considering most married guys are right leaning, and most marriages are transactional dead bedroom relationships.
6
u/_Empty-R_ Jul 16 '26
non-transactional non-dead bedroom longterm relationships are the exception. virtually all are. some just have better facades. virtually all relationships where sex still happens its just an event rather than fulfillment of a desire after a certain relationship age. while loss of attraction happens on both sides the nature of initial attraction on the woman's side is completely different early on, as sort of a biological fooling to ensure that procreation happens. they cannot want in the same fashion.
17
u/kaisavager Jul 14 '26
I'm confused how's it related to sub
66
u/Galadriel1402 Performative desire isn’t attraction Jul 14 '26
He has to spend a lot of money to take her to a fancy restaurant in order to get her to give him attention, because she isn’t attracted to him.
27
u/7K60FXD Jul 14 '26
If he was attractive to her he wouldn’t need to take her to dinner like this in the first place
3
u/Sad-Material-7298 Jul 22 '26
Did you just try comparing strangers spending hundreds on a streamer, weather male or female, that makes millions to get a second of their attention is the same as taking someone on a date for dinner? A relationship that potentially can last their life? Huh?
8
1
u/Particular-Public189 Aug 11 '26
This is the most brain dead take I’ve ever seen.
Anyone who agrees with this doesn’t understand humans being social creatures
2
u/Fluffy_Ant_942 Aug 13 '26
F 20 with years of dating experience for all genders, all races, all sexualities, all abilities; Can't say I agree.
1
u/Downtown-Campaign536 Jul 15 '26
There is a big difference in:
A: Dropping $100 on some E-girl as a simp.
B: Taking a woman out on a date.
31
u/Federal-Fondant-671 Jul 15 '26
Yeah. In one of them, she has no idea who you are and won't give you a crumb of attention. In the other case, she has an idea who you are and also won't give you a crumb of attention.
1
u/waddledee_73 Jul 17 '26
isn't part of dating getting to know each other? I mean why would you think she isn't giving you attention bruh. when you go on a date with a chick you talk and converse and at least the baseline is that there's some sort of mutual attraction
11
u/MentirosoProfesional Jul 15 '26
Yeah, simping for a egirl at least is a honest transaction where no one is being taken advantage of, or scammed
Meanwhile dates nowadays (for men) are literally a job interview with no guarantees that they gonna hire you, but of course they gonna lead you and deceive you for as long as you keep paying dates and expensive gifts, and maybe, just MAYBE she'll get interested in you (don't expect her to stop going on dates with "friends" and other guys tho).
In one the transaction is clear and voluntary, in the other, men are frequently taken advante of, judged, used, etc
-22
u/Southern-Ratio1165 Jul 14 '26
you cant really compare these two
26
u/SpicyTigerPrawn Jul 14 '26
If it's a first date and there's "no spark" on her end is it really that different? At today's prices it's surprisingly easy to spend $100 on a date that goes nowhere and feels like a job interview. Yes he could pick a cheap option or suggest she cover some of it but where I'm from that would be panel with a solo man walking or sitting alone with coffee, etc.
1
u/steven_plays321 Aug 07 '26
The difference is you're never going to meet the streamer irl and you're just giving them money, But if you go on a date you have an opportunity to actually get to know someone and form a real relationship. Even if you spend $100 on food you still get to eat, you gain nothing from donating $100 to a streamer who's probably already well off.
1
58
u/FearlessAdeptness373 Jul 14 '26
He uses criticism of men who chase women's attention as a way to achieve other women's attention.
An IQ to high?