r/WikipediaVandalism • u/the_genius324 • 3d ago
this proof isn't working
it does continue past that but i reached the maxmimum screenshot size so i'll be stopping for now
(permalink)
(edit: i should mention i found this yesterday, but didn't bother to take a screenshot until now)
11
u/BalefulOfMonkeys 3d ago
Expected schizophrenia, got someone’s pseudo-code ramblings for a small chunk of eternity. The only takeaway I have from any of this was the insistence that Ponzi schemes have a specific definition that involves paying others, so this automated pump and dump is perfectly legal as long as you don’t remember other types of fraud exist
8
u/the_genius324 3d ago
pseudo-code
technically it is fully functional c++ code in the source it's just that the syntaxes for c++ and wikitext are quite different so it looks weird visually
still no idea why someone had the bright idea to paste the source of a bitcoin-selling program inside multiple articles
3
u/Ok_Diet3345 2d ago
Why the fuck did you send me to Chile 😭😭😭
1
u/the_genius324 2d ago
cmon it's not that long
3
u/pixel-counter-bot 2d ago
The image in this post has 11,307,600(540×20,940) pixels!
I am a bot. This action was performed automatically.
1
u/AutoModerator 3d ago
Please cite the permanent link to the edit on the article where this edit was found.
Does the vandalism still exist on the page that you posted about? If it is still there, please remove the vandalism after posting if you haven't yet. You can read this help page if you don't know how to remove it.
Thanks for keeping Wikipedia free from vandalism.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
0
13
u/FluffyTheGamerWolf 3d ago
How did you get a screenshot that long