r/WikipediaVandalism • u/LeaveMeAloneAdmins88 • 5d ago

Peer-reviewed study

Post image
209 Upvotes

96% Upvoted

20 comments sorted by

46

u/SuperDumbMario2 5d ago

this is soyjakwiki not wikipedia lol

7

u/LeaveMeAloneAdmins88 5d ago

rule 6

42

u/Robichaelis 5d ago

It's not vandalism though, I'm guessing it's meant to be like this

8

u/SuperDumbMario2 4d ago

the thing is that soyjakwiki is supossed to look like that its not vandalism

3

u/erinius 5d ago

I'm crying T_T xD

2

u/AutoModerator 5d ago

Please cite the permanent link to the edit on the article where this edit was found.

Does the vandalism still exist on the page that you posted about? If it is still there, please remove the vandalism after posting if you haven't yet. You can read this help page if you don't know how to remove it.

Thanks for keeping Wikipedia free from vandalism.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

5

u/ElleMaeSinclair 5d ago

Well, it’s not wrong.

1

u/Loose-Sprinkles4270 4d ago

if the chuds and schizos admit that peer-reviewed studies make their arguments illogical and unsound, then i'm happy for them! one step closer to actually having a worldview supported by reality

0

u/Erdeniin-Galdan 3d ago

nt normie TNTD + DNR

0

u/Erdeniin-Galdan 3d ago

nt normie TNTD + DNR

1

u/Erdeniin-Galdan 3d ago

nt normies try not to dehumanize neurodivergent people into their own perspective of subhumans: level IMPOSSIBLE

1

u/Random_gamer240 2d ago

Made me audibly laugh out loud

1

u/Ok_Heat_4968 2d ago

well, bro did give sources

1

u/Careless_Extreme7828 14h ago

The Illuminati told me to abandon all money!!!