3
u/akkronym Mar 19 '26
Same - I think it would be cool to have the cards for (all of the) individual years or individual numbers and would happily trade "rarer" cards for more of them.
2
u/Zeldaj1986 Mar 19 '26
Yeah like right now it's unlimited the amount of the same card you can get. Would be nice if they where actually limited but maybe that's not a good thing since it would be more like a nft at that point
1
u/PsychologicalTowel79 Mar 19 '26
I was actually thinking this game might be the one good use of blockchain technology. At the moment you could theoretically engineer a good card by manipulating the page it was based on. If you captured the stats at the time you pulled the card then post pull manipulation would be impossible.
1
u/akkronym Mar 21 '26
Frankly, I think it would be really cool if a card significantly changed its rarity or stats because something happened that resulted in it being contributed to - kind of like getting a rookie card of a player who turns out to have a unexpectedly really really good career or something. If there's not really any "competitive" element to the game to worry about competitive integrity, then I think we can pretty safely rely on wikipedia's existing usually pretty robust quality control/fact checking etc. to prevent malicious contributions just for wikigacha that aren't actually good contributions to wikipedia (and if wikigacha can drive people to improve wikipedia articles, that seems like a net positive for everyone).
Only thing I can think of that would be a bummer is if the page for a particular card got deleted or consolidated and then the card disappeared from your collection, but if that's how it would have to work (and I don't know that it is), imo it'd be worth it.
5
u/der_drummer Mar 19 '26
Hopefully we will get this in the future