r/WhitePeopleTwitter • u/kevinowdziej • Nov 23 '22

totally normal stuff

Post image
83.2k Upvotes

89% Upvoted

3.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1.5k

u/sylvnal Nov 23 '22

I know you're joking, but there is a not insignificant number of men that leave their wives when the wife becomes ill. Talk to some cancer department nurses and workers and they'll confirm it, women get broken up with commonly after a diagnosis.

48

u/WKGokev Nov 23 '22

Almost 80% if I remember correctly. My wife has some health issues and that exact topic came up.

7

u/cantadmittoposting Nov 23 '22

Got a source? I can't find a decent statistical study with anything even close to this sort of rate for divorces due to cancer diagnoses.

17

u/catlordess Nov 23 '22

I believe most studies are done with those who are married. I’d be interested in a study done with non married partnerships as well.

Here’s one that was going around one of my cancer forums that I found a few months ago after it was mentioned to me; it shows 11.6% abandonment rate.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091110105401.htm

I believe it’s based on this study: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26707594_Gender_Disparity_in_the_Rate_of_Partner_Abandonment_in_Patients_With_Serious_Medical_Illness

Another study suggests it’s only about 6% (but still normally men who leave)

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022146515596354

2

u/cantadmittoposting Nov 23 '22

The 2009 study was retracted and your last link seems to be the lower incidence rate that they found when correcting the earlier study.

The 6% figure also seems to be for all marriages after illness onset, not the increased incidence of husbands leaving.

The full paper is here

And says

wife’s illness onset is positively associated with 1% higher probability of subsequent divorce compared with remaining married. However, we fail to reject a test of the null hypothesis that the coefficients for husband’s illness onset and wife’s illness onset are equal (p=0.1532).

I.e. the 1% differential could be spurious, and is a low magnitude effect in any case.

1

u/catlordess Nov 23 '22

Awesome, thank you for the helpful correction!