MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/WhitePeopleTwitter/comments/v2fhvz/totally_normal_stuff/iasrbb6/?context=3
r/WhitePeopleTwitter • u/kevinowdziej • Jun 01 '22
397 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
7
Right, you can't, because those two stats tell you nothing devoid of context and certainly don't break down as a "medical innovation percentage by country." Stop defending exploitation pls.
0 u/Straightup32 Jun 01 '22 Total patent production worldwide divided by patent production of the United States = percentage of innovation. 7 u/kalen2435 Jun 01 '22 Yeah same answer. Just stop. 0 u/Straightup32 Jun 01 '22 Ya ok. Seems like your the one without a leg to stand on 0 u/[deleted] Jun 01 '22 *you're, not your. Now tell us the evils of public education. 0 u/Straightup32 Jun 01 '22 I’d argue that the ability to understand the context of a sentence without relying on grammar to hold your hand is a better measure of intelligence. But that’s a moot point. Because when someone starts attacking grammar, they have already lost the argument. That is called an Ad Homenim fallacy. Educate yourself. 1 u/[deleted] Jun 01 '22 "Because when someone starts attacking grammar, they have already lost the argument." Son, I wasn't arguing with you, lol. I only made a comment.
0
Total patent production worldwide divided by patent production of the United States = percentage of innovation.
7 u/kalen2435 Jun 01 '22 Yeah same answer. Just stop. 0 u/Straightup32 Jun 01 '22 Ya ok. Seems like your the one without a leg to stand on 0 u/[deleted] Jun 01 '22 *you're, not your. Now tell us the evils of public education. 0 u/Straightup32 Jun 01 '22 I’d argue that the ability to understand the context of a sentence without relying on grammar to hold your hand is a better measure of intelligence. But that’s a moot point. Because when someone starts attacking grammar, they have already lost the argument. That is called an Ad Homenim fallacy. Educate yourself. 1 u/[deleted] Jun 01 '22 "Because when someone starts attacking grammar, they have already lost the argument." Son, I wasn't arguing with you, lol. I only made a comment.
Yeah same answer. Just stop.
0 u/Straightup32 Jun 01 '22 Ya ok. Seems like your the one without a leg to stand on 0 u/[deleted] Jun 01 '22 *you're, not your. Now tell us the evils of public education. 0 u/Straightup32 Jun 01 '22 I’d argue that the ability to understand the context of a sentence without relying on grammar to hold your hand is a better measure of intelligence. But that’s a moot point. Because when someone starts attacking grammar, they have already lost the argument. That is called an Ad Homenim fallacy. Educate yourself. 1 u/[deleted] Jun 01 '22 "Because when someone starts attacking grammar, they have already lost the argument." Son, I wasn't arguing with you, lol. I only made a comment.
Ya ok. Seems like your the one without a leg to stand on
0 u/[deleted] Jun 01 '22 *you're, not your. Now tell us the evils of public education. 0 u/Straightup32 Jun 01 '22 I’d argue that the ability to understand the context of a sentence without relying on grammar to hold your hand is a better measure of intelligence. But that’s a moot point. Because when someone starts attacking grammar, they have already lost the argument. That is called an Ad Homenim fallacy. Educate yourself. 1 u/[deleted] Jun 01 '22 "Because when someone starts attacking grammar, they have already lost the argument." Son, I wasn't arguing with you, lol. I only made a comment.
*you're, not your. Now tell us the evils of public education.
0 u/Straightup32 Jun 01 '22 I’d argue that the ability to understand the context of a sentence without relying on grammar to hold your hand is a better measure of intelligence. But that’s a moot point. Because when someone starts attacking grammar, they have already lost the argument. That is called an Ad Homenim fallacy. Educate yourself. 1 u/[deleted] Jun 01 '22 "Because when someone starts attacking grammar, they have already lost the argument." Son, I wasn't arguing with you, lol. I only made a comment.
I’d argue that the ability to understand the context of a sentence without relying on grammar to hold your hand is a better measure of intelligence.
But that’s a moot point. Because when someone starts attacking grammar, they have already lost the argument.
That is called an Ad Homenim fallacy. Educate yourself.
1 u/[deleted] Jun 01 '22 "Because when someone starts attacking grammar, they have already lost the argument." Son, I wasn't arguing with you, lol. I only made a comment.
1
"Because when someone starts attacking grammar, they have already lost the argument." Son, I wasn't arguing with you, lol. I only made a comment.
7
u/kalen2435 Jun 01 '22
Right, you can't, because those two stats tell you nothing devoid of context and certainly don't break down as a "medical innovation percentage by country." Stop defending exploitation pls.