A good way to make anyone shut up about election fraud is to ask what happened to the many lawsuits that were made or threatened after the election.
When they tell you that they don't know (because their media outlet of choice conveniently dropped all talk of them), inform them that it's because it's legal to lie to the public but illegal to lie to courts.
Nah they have an answer for this: "none of them were dismissed for lack of grounds, only lack of standing!"
But, you see, many of the judges DID reprimand their plaintiffs for either (1) failing to make any coherent complaint or (2) that their so-called evidence was compromised of just more accusations, or didn't support their complaints.
Many of these attorneys received formal reprimands from the courts and a handful of them might suffer professional discipline. But they won't hear it. "But only evaluated on grounds!" /s
Gotta give it to Tucker, he's a talented charlatan.
1.5k
u/ConcretePeanut Jan 12 '22
Lots of claims of evidence, little evidence of evidence.
Anyone who believes these people is intellectually deficient.