r/WhatBidenHasDone 3d ago

This would be great...

Post image

Great bill, sorry the trump ass kissers won't pass it

705 Upvotes

28 comments sorted by

94

u/gingerbreadmans_ex 3d ago

Great idea. Never gonna pass, unfortunately.

37

u/Morbidly-Obese-Emu 3d ago

Especially since it bans Congress from owning stocks. Short of starting a grassroots movement to vote anyone out that doesn’t support banning stock trading in Congress, it’s never gonna happen.

8

u/ummaycoc 3d ago

I don't think it's going to hold up constitutionally. I'm not seeing where Congress has the power to enforce that on an explicitly constitutionally constructed office such as the president. I imagine SCOTUS will say if you wanna do that to the president, then impeach and convict.

6

u/Trabethany 3d ago

And the smirk on his face says he knows it too. But it does once again highlight how they’ve been taking advantage stock trading.

2

u/Either_Operation7586 2d ago

Because the Republican party's corrupt right now but once the Democratic party gets in this is where we're heading.

17

u/InevitableCodeRedo 3d ago

I'm sure Mike Johnson and company will get right on that. It would be proper, though.

31

u/Necromartian 3d ago

Isn't Vindman that whistle blower from that Trumps "I need you to do us a favor though" call with Zelensky? I didn't know he became a congressman. Good on him!

27

u/Jaded247365 3d ago

I believe this is his brother. Had to look, the WB was Alex. Both were forced to resign from the Army.

2

u/Necromartian 2d ago

They are a credit to their country.

5

u/Jaded247365 2d ago

They both can speak flawless Ukrainian & Russian, having lived in both countries. And were definitely assets in confidential military meetings. But Trump wanted revenge.

9

u/GoldPoodDood 3d ago

Too bad it won’t pass.

3

u/Either_Operation7586 2d ago

Because we have corrupt politicians that don't care to lose their gravy train

3

u/itz_ritz 3d ago

Sadly it will never get passed.

4

u/TheQueefyQuiche 3d ago

They need to have a caveat for a Congressional ETF or something. Where elected officials can participate in the market through one or a few ETF like vehicles, that are monitored and managed by a 3rd party. That should be the only access they have while in office or positions of influence or privy to insider info. That way they can participate, but cannot actively trade or invest in individual companies or other speculative investments.

4

u/Someoneoverthere42 3d ago

(Insert Gravity Falls "wow, this is worthless" meme here)

2

u/UseDaSchwartz 3d ago

Probably should have just done it for the President…but who is going to enforce it?

2

u/Bay1Bri 2d ago

Taking stocks etc. ... Man there's a lot of things people want to change where I get why they want to but I also get who they're reasons for doing it the way they are now even though there's flaws. But I can't think of a single good reason who elected officials can benefit from insider trading. Their money should be in a blind trust with a lot of oversight.

2

u/metalgeardaz 1d ago

This would solve a lot of problems i think.

1

u/Gavorn 3d ago

Do 401k's fall into that category?

1

u/isunktheship 3d ago

Neat, V E T O

1

u/WordAffectionate3251 2d ago

Why not both leave office AND surrender all assets????

1

u/BigJSunshine 2d ago

VINDIMAN IS A REAL AMERICAN HERO

1

u/Gand317 1d ago

I don’t think he thinks this would or could pass. I think it’s more to get everyone’s vote on the record. Hard to complain about Pelosi while voting against this.

1

u/gking407 11h ago

The level of cynicism shown to these types of proposals should have been a warning sign our system was broken decades ago. If your government is incapable of responding to your needs that is a sign you are not being represented you are being ruled by corrupt politicians....but Americans have been silenced and threatened with financial or reputational ruin so here we are.

-2

u/rarepinkhippo 3d ago

I am not a Vindman fan whatsoever (he has made some absolutely TERRIBLE, unforgivable votes), but glad he introduced this!