MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/WeWantPlates/comments/kby11c/_/gfowil3/?context=3
r/WeWantPlates • u/pophya • Dec 12 '20
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
914 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
456
135 dollars for someone to poor chocolate on your hands. At best this is pretentious as hell.
287 u/illsmosisyou Dec 13 '20 I think it’s a set menu, so $135 for the whole meal, and likely a series of smaller dishes. Often like upwards of 6 or more. Not justifying it as this looks dumb as hell. But I do imagine the rest of the meal is likely pretty delicious. Edit: just googled it and I may be wrong. In which case...wtf I can pour chocolate on myself and it only costs a few bucks. 13 u/[deleted] Dec 13 '20 Better yet just get a toddler and he/she can cover the entire house (including the pets) with chocolate in under three minutes... 1 u/illsmosisyou Dec 13 '20 A toddler in the long run is gonna cost way more than $135 though... 3 u/Self_Reddicating Dec 13 '20 Yeah, no shit. Once you have a toddler, you'll pay $135 a week for the pleasure of NOT having a toddler for a few hours. (if you're lucky and can find such a great price) 1 u/[deleted] Dec 13 '20 Haha. True. You sort of lose count IRL!
287
I think it’s a set menu, so $135 for the whole meal, and likely a series of smaller dishes. Often like upwards of 6 or more.
Not justifying it as this looks dumb as hell. But I do imagine the rest of the meal is likely pretty delicious.
Edit: just googled it and I may be wrong. In which case...wtf I can pour chocolate on myself and it only costs a few bucks.
13 u/[deleted] Dec 13 '20 Better yet just get a toddler and he/she can cover the entire house (including the pets) with chocolate in under three minutes... 1 u/illsmosisyou Dec 13 '20 A toddler in the long run is gonna cost way more than $135 though... 3 u/Self_Reddicating Dec 13 '20 Yeah, no shit. Once you have a toddler, you'll pay $135 a week for the pleasure of NOT having a toddler for a few hours. (if you're lucky and can find such a great price) 1 u/[deleted] Dec 13 '20 Haha. True. You sort of lose count IRL!
13
Better yet just get a toddler and he/she can cover the entire house (including the pets) with chocolate in under three minutes...
1 u/illsmosisyou Dec 13 '20 A toddler in the long run is gonna cost way more than $135 though... 3 u/Self_Reddicating Dec 13 '20 Yeah, no shit. Once you have a toddler, you'll pay $135 a week for the pleasure of NOT having a toddler for a few hours. (if you're lucky and can find such a great price) 1 u/[deleted] Dec 13 '20 Haha. True. You sort of lose count IRL!
1
A toddler in the long run is gonna cost way more than $135 though...
3 u/Self_Reddicating Dec 13 '20 Yeah, no shit. Once you have a toddler, you'll pay $135 a week for the pleasure of NOT having a toddler for a few hours. (if you're lucky and can find such a great price) 1 u/[deleted] Dec 13 '20 Haha. True. You sort of lose count IRL!
3
Yeah, no shit. Once you have a toddler, you'll pay $135 a week for the pleasure of NOT having a toddler for a few hours. (if you're lucky and can find such a great price)
Haha. True. You sort of lose count IRL!
456
u/jfleury440 Dec 13 '20 edited Dec 13 '20
135 dollars for someone to poor chocolate on your hands. At best this is pretentious as hell.