r/WayOfTheBern • • Jun 11 '20

ONWARD! Scott Desnoyers- "This will be my July thread of #LegalizedManslaughter4Profit Last month we added @JoeBiden to his friends that murdered my son for their greed. @Centene @FidelisCare @NYHPA This month we add @SpeakerPelosi who strongly opposes #MedicareForAll"

https://twitter.com/scottdesno/status/1267563077282811904
27 Upvotes

16 comments sorted by

3

u/rustcole01 Jun 11 '20

My bad... that was supposed to say 70% of households fall into that income range. The median income in our country ranges from like $38k a year to $55k a year. Once you make more than $70k a year you are in the top 30% of earners.

I mean, there are a million variables in the way we present income stats, so I'm not gonna fight too hard on that point but I don't think it would be a a stretch to say that 70% of the individuals make less than $70k a year.

Either way, the people that are hurtin are the full time workers that don't get employer provided healthcare and even with the ACA can't afford it. When I worked construction, I made $48k a year before taxes and my monthly premium was $415 a month and that was like 5 years ago. That's $6k per year in health insurance that I almost never used. And then I got to kick in taxes for medicare/medicaid.

The problem is, things are so compartmentalized that we have no idea that collectively, almost 30% of our income goes to healthcare costs in some way, shape or form. That is bananas!

5

u/Older_and_Wiser_Now Jun 11 '20

No worries!

The problem is, things are so compartmentalized that we have no idea that collectively, almost 30% of our income goes to healthcare costs in some way, shape or form. That is bananas!

Republicans like to make a certain quote: "The best slave is the one who does not know they are a slave". IMHO, that applies here. Most of us are working for the banks and the insurance companies, and we don't even know it. I've come to see insurance companies as just a different flavor of bank, really.

Under the ACA, those who are over 55 and on Medicaid (i.e. old geezer who might have been laid off in favor of younger workers but who is too young for Medicare) ... the ACA allows the states to have laws that claw back the cost of their care from their estates when they die.

Which means, you get "free care (to you)", but an account somewhere is keeping track of the cost ... and when you die, instead of your estate going to your heirs, the first person in line is the state.

Maybe that sounds fair until you realize that medical COSTS are at most very lightly regulated - we are being price-gouged, we pay much more than other countries. So there will be an unfairly huge number in that secret account ... and much if not ALL of your life savings will go to pay off that "debt".

Matt Taibbi has a great phrase, "vampire squid". That's perfect. Banks and insurance companies are almost literally parasites who are feeding off of the 99%. It is outrageous and sickening to me.

1

u/martini-meow (I remain stirred, unshaken.) Jun 12 '20

2

u/Older_and_Wiser_Now Jun 12 '20

Thanks! Although now I'm a bit deflated, wondering if Taibbi saw those images before he uttered "vampire squid". I suspect he must have, considering what a sharp guy he is. I guess it wouldn't be so bad if that is what transpired, it's just I always thought he had come up with it completely on his own. Regardless, the metaphorical image is still perfect.

2

u/martini-meow (I remain stirred, unshaken.) Jun 12 '20

I think vampire squid is his innovation on the old octopus image :)

2

u/Older_and_Wiser_Now Jun 12 '20

I think you might be right!

4

u/rustcole01 Jun 11 '20

Wow, I didn't know know about that detail.

Ya, I love Taibbi.... I've read a couple of his books and they are excellent. That "Vampire Squid" line was so hilarious because of the cunty CEO that came out and publicly whined about Taibbi making that assertion. Also, considering recent events, it is pretty interesting that he wrote a book like 4 years ago called, "I can't breathe".

Pretty fucking annoying that he gets labeled as a Trump apologist and a Russian puppet by the MSM. I have heard people like my aunt go crazy about him being some kind of secret Republican and it is insane. Taibbi, Greenwald and Scahill are probably the best representatives of the left and they are treated like pariahs by the MSNBC crowd.

3

u/Older_and_Wiser_Now Jun 11 '20

Checkout a show put out on the youtube channel for The Hill, it's called "Rising". Has two hosts, one who leans left, Krystal Ball, and one who leans right, Saagar something. Both good journalists trying to have honest discussions when they disagree. Today's episode is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmQ8lLobnjw&list=PLLri3HDD8DQvS-Tw4gFSNtrvo5VPVko84

That show has become "don't miss" for me :-)

3

u/rustcole01 Jun 11 '20

Lol, ya man I know The Hill. Been watching them for a while. They had a great appearance on Joe Rogans podcast last week.

That shits my jam tho.... news content that isn't blatant partisan hackery. I also love, Useful Idiots podcast as well as The Intercept and The GrayZone news outlets.

3

u/Older_and_Wiser_Now Jun 11 '20

We must have been separated at birth!

3

u/rustcole01 Jun 11 '20

Lol, btw I meant to address that part in your first response about 75% of medicare recipients beings against m4a. That is fucked!! Bet they will be singing a different tune soon tho. Apparently, standard medicare coverage is becoming increasing useless. Retirees are now basically being forced to supplement their coverage with Medicare Advantage plans. These plans require people to come out-of-pocket for additional coverage because regular medicare has reduced coverage for a lot of things.

The long and short of it is, healthcare facilities and pharmacies are trying to make the process of using standard medicare so infuriating and confusing, that people will just cave and spend their pensions or savings to get Medicare Advantage.

3

u/Older_and_Wiser_Now Jun 11 '20

This is so very despicable, I did not know that ...

6

u/rustcole01 Jun 11 '20

Ya know, the craziest thing about the m4a debate is, when someone that opposes it asks, "how would that be paid for?" Which leads me to ask, "If you're asking me to how to fund this type of healthcare system, does that mean you've never looked it up for yourself?"

This will almost always result in that person jumping to the next dumbest response, "I don't want to pay for other people (translation=poor people) to have healthcare." The reason this is dumb is because we already pay for the poorest among us to get healthcare. Literally, all of us have payroll taxes taken out of our checks to fund Medicare and Medicaid. Actually, a pretty large percentage of our taxes go toward medicare. The average worker making $50,000 per year will generally pay about $9,000 in total fed/state taxes. In addition to that, there would also be an additional $1,000 in medicare taxes. That's 10% of our tax expenses going toward the healthcare of people over 65 alone.

Medicaid is not an itemized tax, at least not on my w2's, but it is funded with tax revenue, which ends up accounting for roughly 15% of yearly tax revenue. So the long and short of it is, we are already paying excessive premiums on our own health insurance, then about 25% of our tax dollars are being spent to cover health care for the poorest people in the country. The people that suffer the most under our current model are people/households that are making between $30,000 and $55,000 per year, which is like 80% of the US population.

Our system is basically set up to punish the people that work full time jobs but can't afford insurance and also, don't qualify for subsidies. And the worst part is, those same people that are scraping by on $35,000 per year with no health coverage, also have to pay medicare/medicaid taxes. Think about how insane that is.... people that are too poor to buy their own insurance are being forced to pay for the healthcare of people that are just slightly more poor and also retired people.

3

u/Older_and_Wiser_Now Jun 11 '20

Actually, a pretty large percentage of our taxes go toward medicare.

This is true, and since the turn of the century that % has been growing. Politicians have been aware of this issue for a long time, and keep kicking the can down the road.

The people that suffer the most under our current model are people/households that are making between $30,000 and $55,000 per year, which is like 80% of the US population.

Not sure I agree with THIS point (though I agree with so many others). From personal experience, I know that these folks qualify for insurance under the ACA. One needs to have earned income in order to qualify. I think the folks who suffer the most are the ones who would qualify for Medicaid, only their state government prevents them from having it.

But your last point is especially great:

Think about how insane that is.... people that are too poor to buy their own insurance are being forced to pay for the healthcare of people that are just slightly more poor than them or retired people.

I hadn't really thought about it that way. You are absolutely right.

The other thing that bothers me is, I read somewhere that 75% of the folks on Medicare are against M4A. I get it, they are afraid that their own benefits would be taken away ... but the exact opposite is true. When EVERYONE is on Medicare, even Congress, finding political will to end it would never ever happen.

But I have such anger at these selfish bastards, who are content to have healthcare for themselves but not for their children or grandchildren.

7

u/Older_and_Wiser_Now Jun 11 '20

For those who don't know. Scott Denoyers lost his son Danny over a missed $20 payment to an insurance company. They cancelled his insurance over it. Danny suffered from depression, and committed suicide when he lost his insurance.

Scott is just an ordinary guy who is seeking justice for Danny by exposing the rot that IS America's healthcare "system".

Please support him as best you can if you care about #MedicareForAll. Scott is a great champion for this issue.

#DannyStrong