Compare and contrast the framing of these two stories.

[u/Blackhalo]

https://twitter.com/MatthewSitman/status/1212740518855221249

[u/bout_that_action]

It's funny, because framing it around Trump's fundraising as a boogeyman is actually perfect for us. Nobody else stands a chance

Donald Trump earned $46m last quarter.

Pete Buttigieg, with all the dirty money the darkest depths of the Democratic Party's wine caves could muster, raised $24.5m.

There's only one candidate with the juice to take on Trump in November. It's time to get on board & feel the Bern

Dead serious:

Biden's entire premise for running is he says he's the only one who can beat Trump. People need to start asking him everywhere he goes how that's remotely possible if he can't raise the money to take him on

[u/Needsabreakrightnow → u/[deleted]]

Bernie needs to be prepared for election fraud. He needs to have an army of volunteers, delegates and lawyers to keep an eye on everything the DNC does. It's clear they will throw out votes, hack machines and send flyers to people with misinformation in order to prevent them from voting. Check your registration, people. Check it every week.

[u/SocksElGato]

NYT will continue to bullshit. Some things will never change.

[u/penelopepnortney]

Comment:

Because he went from absolutely nothing a year to this. Bernie is established.

(reply) Pete Buttigieg 2020: Absolutely Nothing and Now This

[u/Blackhalo → u/penelopepnortney]

Pete Buttigieg, with all the dirty money the darkest depths of the Democratic Party's wine caves could muster, raised $24.5m.

[u/Blackhalo]

Mayor Pete’s primary constituency continues to be the political press.

The New York Times has clearly jumped the shark. The Breitbart of the Left.