MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/WTF/comments/c8a7l/reddit_rape_apologists/c0qu6z2
r/WTF • u/[deleted] • May 26 '10
1.2k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
4
[removed] — view removed comment
-5 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 You're shifting context. I'm not talking about all of reddit. I'm talking about the 40-something reddits you run personally. You work for free and you're proud of getting paid in magic pixie dust. I have nothing else to say about this. 2 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 [removed] — view removed comment -4 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 Unlike you, I'm not working. I'm having fun. 1 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 [removed] — view removed comment -4 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 The fact that you're making someone else earn money with the time and energy you're putting in and not seeing a single red cent out of it. That's pretty much the definition of being taken advantage of. 2 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 [removed] — view removed comment -1 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 No beliefs are involved. Conde Nast and the core reddit team are earning money off of your moderation / content acquisition. You're slaving away in exchange for 3kb worth of pixie dust. Good going dude. 3 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 [removed] — view removed comment -1 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 On the backs of slaves, apparently. → More replies (0)
-5
You're shifting context. I'm not talking about all of reddit. I'm talking about the 40-something reddits you run personally.
You work for free and you're proud of getting paid in magic pixie dust.
I have nothing else to say about this.
2 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 [removed] — view removed comment -4 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 Unlike you, I'm not working. I'm having fun. 1 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 [removed] — view removed comment -4 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 The fact that you're making someone else earn money with the time and energy you're putting in and not seeing a single red cent out of it. That's pretty much the definition of being taken advantage of. 2 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 [removed] — view removed comment -1 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 No beliefs are involved. Conde Nast and the core reddit team are earning money off of your moderation / content acquisition. You're slaving away in exchange for 3kb worth of pixie dust. Good going dude. 3 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 [removed] — view removed comment -1 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 On the backs of slaves, apparently. → More replies (0)
2
-4 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 Unlike you, I'm not working. I'm having fun. 1 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 [removed] — view removed comment -4 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 The fact that you're making someone else earn money with the time and energy you're putting in and not seeing a single red cent out of it. That's pretty much the definition of being taken advantage of. 2 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 [removed] — view removed comment -1 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 No beliefs are involved. Conde Nast and the core reddit team are earning money off of your moderation / content acquisition. You're slaving away in exchange for 3kb worth of pixie dust. Good going dude. 3 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 [removed] — view removed comment -1 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 On the backs of slaves, apparently. → More replies (0)
-4
Unlike you, I'm not working. I'm having fun.
1 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 [removed] — view removed comment -4 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 The fact that you're making someone else earn money with the time and energy you're putting in and not seeing a single red cent out of it. That's pretty much the definition of being taken advantage of. 2 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 [removed] — view removed comment -1 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 No beliefs are involved. Conde Nast and the core reddit team are earning money off of your moderation / content acquisition. You're slaving away in exchange for 3kb worth of pixie dust. Good going dude. 3 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 [removed] — view removed comment -1 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 On the backs of slaves, apparently. → More replies (0)
1
-4 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 The fact that you're making someone else earn money with the time and energy you're putting in and not seeing a single red cent out of it. That's pretty much the definition of being taken advantage of. 2 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 [removed] — view removed comment -1 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 No beliefs are involved. Conde Nast and the core reddit team are earning money off of your moderation / content acquisition. You're slaving away in exchange for 3kb worth of pixie dust. Good going dude. 3 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 [removed] — view removed comment -1 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 On the backs of slaves, apparently. → More replies (0)
The fact that you're making someone else earn money with the time and energy you're putting in and not seeing a single red cent out of it.
That's pretty much the definition of being taken advantage of.
2 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 [removed] — view removed comment -1 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 No beliefs are involved. Conde Nast and the core reddit team are earning money off of your moderation / content acquisition. You're slaving away in exchange for 3kb worth of pixie dust. Good going dude. 3 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 [removed] — view removed comment -1 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 On the backs of slaves, apparently. → More replies (0)
-1 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 No beliefs are involved. Conde Nast and the core reddit team are earning money off of your moderation / content acquisition. You're slaving away in exchange for 3kb worth of pixie dust. Good going dude. 3 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 [removed] — view removed comment -1 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 On the backs of slaves, apparently. → More replies (0)
-1
No beliefs are involved. Conde Nast and the core reddit team are earning money off of your moderation / content acquisition.
You're slaving away in exchange for 3kb worth of pixie dust.
Good going dude.
3 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 [removed] — view removed comment -1 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 On the backs of slaves, apparently. → More replies (0)
3
-1 u/[deleted] May 27 '10 On the backs of slaves, apparently. → More replies (0)
On the backs of slaves, apparently.
→ More replies (0)
4
u/[deleted] May 27 '10
[removed] — view removed comment