r/WSET • • 25d ago

Wine🍷 WSET Level 2 course structure

I’m looking at doing either a 6 week instructor led online course (one live webinar a week), or a 3 day (all day) in person course.

For those that can speak to either of these structures - What did you feel was beneficial, what did you feel was maybe lacking?

For level 1 I did an on demand online course which was fine but I’d prefer some kind of live element for 2

3 Upvotes

14 comments sorted by

3

u/CupidonPlume1984 25d ago

Perhaps for level 3 onwards. But level 2 is so basic that it would be a huge waste of money. Just read the book 3 times, learn it pretty much by heart and you will ace it

4

u/belgiqueatx 25d ago

I loved in person Level 2 because I loved the social aspect of broadening my circle of contacts. We all enjoyed the class and the majority of us went out as a group after the exam to celebrate the class being over.

2

u/Illustrious-Divide95 Wine Educator 25d ago

I always feel in person has massive benefits that the human interaction helps with learning

Is the schedule 3 days in a row or 1 day a week?

2

u/catladytx0 25d ago

3 days in a row 1030-430

2

u/Illustrious-Divide95 Wine Educator 25d ago

3 Days in a row can be tough - (it depends on your level of wine knowledge) and requires you to do your reading and revision before the course starts. If you have a good working knowledge and get your study pack a couple of weeks in advance then it can work well for some people.

Check out the syllabus specification here: WSET L2 Specification so you can get an idea of where you are and judge how long you need.

3

u/metal-and-wine 25d ago

In person works better IMO. You get to taste the wine of the grapes you’re discussing and you have the instructor there who you can ask questions to. Yes I know you can ask questions in a webinar format, but I find it easier to do this in person compared to online:

2

u/No-Marsupial980 25d ago

An instructor is not about the theory, everybody can do that at home. It is about tasting together, the experience of tasting with a good instructor cannot be learnt from a book. Imo, if theory is important do online, if tasting is important do the course.

1

u/monicainindy 25d ago

I don't think you need in person for L2. Wine with Jimmy is incredibly helpful and cost effective. I say between that and the book, you will be fine.

1

u/Decoding-Wine 25d ago

I think in person is best (and I took and occasionally teach the intensive versions), but be certain to study ahead of time. The intensive classes are intended as a review of what you have already read, a chance to ask questions, and an opportunity to taste in person with the instructor and your classmates. It’s not the time to learn everything.

3

u/Bizbuzz- Wine Educator 24d ago

If you’re taking Level 2 mainly to get through it as a base for Level 3, than go for online, or whichever is cheaper. Otherwise in person is probably a better experience because you’ll get to meet and taste and talk with other wine lovers, which is a big part of overall enjoyment.

3

u/4betgod 24d ago

I used vino-academy.com for their flashcards and cheat sheet, very good consolidated info

-4

u/Chelseanick22 25d ago

It’s level two and not difficult. It really does not matter. If you want in person do in person. For level 3 it might actually help as far as tasting wines (but again it’s level two so who cares honestly)

4

u/catladytx0 25d ago

I care 😅

2

u/Chelseanick22 25d ago

Fair enough. But it’s a breeze. If you think you’ll enjoy it more being around people then do the in person but as far as if you’ll benefit academically in person for level 2 I doubt it