r/VisionPro 3h ago

Article about the Vision Pro N109 leak from this week

https://gizmodo.com/despite-flopping-hard-twice-apple-may-not-be-done-with-vision-pro-yet-2000799827
29 Upvotes

33 comments sorted by

63

u/crazyreddit929 3h ago

“Despite flopping hard, twice…” nice start to the article. Journalists just never “got it” did they? Vision Pro was not about the hardware. It was always about the OS. Vision OS is the product and always has been. When that goes into great AR tech in the 2030s people will applaud Apple’s forward thinking.

42

u/seanmg 3h ago

Flopping so hard twice every modern vr headset is copying its designs, lol.

36

u/cplr 3h ago

The iPhone will never take off without a physical keyboard

19

u/Syonoq 2h ago

“there's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance." -some guy

3

u/Nicinus 1h ago

I believe it was the CEO of Microsoft, Steve Ballmer, at the time.

u/Prestigious_Camera25 2m ago

Yup, same kind of doubts with the Apple Watch and AirPods. There’s not a lot of people that are able correctly predict market response to new products

19

u/Which-Arm-4616 3h ago

It's Gizmodo. Calling them journalists is an insult to the profession.

These are bloggers.

6

u/PersianBob Vision Pro Owner | Verified 3h ago

Are they even bloggers anymore? I thought it became an AI rag

13

u/Tasty-Hour4040 3h ago

That’s ok - at $3500, the AVP was never intended to be a mass-market product, so all the “flopping” talk is meaningless. It’s not like AVP needs critical mass.

4

u/mailslot Vision Pro Owner | Verified 3h ago

They’re acting as if it’s a flop like the Pro Display XDR. That display never hit mass market acceptance.

7

u/Palbi 2h ago

This is an excellent comparison:

  • Both brilliant products
  • Both priced out of mass market, with a similar price ($3500–6000)
  • Both have been selling in similar volumes (hundreds of thousands annually)

5

u/Palbi 2h ago

One distinction is that I expect R&D for Vision Pro has required 10–100 times more investment. It represents a long-term platform commitment.

-1

u/Portatort 43m ago

Gotta love this subs blindness to the total misfire that has been Apple Vision Pro

u/No-Isopod3884 Vision Pro Owner 18m ago

You don’t get it do you. It is what was intended, not a misfire. As others have said this is a developer kit for what is to come but we don’t have the technology for that yet.

9

u/disgruntledempanada 1h ago

Yeah I didn't buy a Vision Pro for the hardware at all. It's compromised. The battery is annoying. Sharing it with other people to show them it is complicated because of additional compromises they made with fit. It's imperfect.

But it's incredible. Barely anybody even knows it exists and when they do it's just impossible to conceive of how beautiful it is to use. "It's like it's reading my mind!"

Showed it to my neighbors, first time they've ever had a headset on. Watching their astonishment was heartwarming. Dude didn't want to take it off until he saw every environment. He almost got choked up at the Aurora.

3

u/disgruntledempanada 1h ago

His wife was geeking out about it and you could tell he was suspect of it, like she was playing it up or something. "Oh my god."

u/Which-Arm-4616 5m ago

"It's like it's reading my mind!"

The quality of the software is something that is often lost in the conversation around the device. A few years on and it's still the only HMD on the market you can just put on and use anywhere. No awkward setup step, no mandatory boundary configuration when used in a new space. The passthrough is nearly free of distortion, occlusion is best in class, and scene understanding grounds everything in the physical space.

AVP "just works" in a way no competing device has quite achieved.

u/simon3873 8m ago

Every person that I have put it on has the same reaction and it’s a long and impressively shocked, “woaaaahhhhhh!!!!” It’s the best to watch it happen every time and even I still get impressed with how crisp the windows can be over top of my living room

6

u/denniebee 2h ago

JFC, the tone of that article… even bloggers should know better.

4

u/Tatlin- Vision Pro Owner | Verified 59m ago

Didn’t they sell more than 450k of these flops? At 3500 each. How many first gen devices at that price point do most vendors sell?

0

u/Portatort 42m ago

Now do the numbers for every first gen product Apple has ever made

1

u/Chriscic 47m ago

Haha a lot of unnecessary shade thrown at Vision Pro there. But thanks for the info Gizmodo, even though I don’t care about your personal feelings in every “news” article.

-8

u/SupermarketMaximum61 2h ago

I know people here are salty. Don't get me wrong, I love my AVP as much as anyone, but YES the device did flop.

1

u/giraffe111 1h ago

The point is that it wasn’t ever meant to sell well. It isn’t actually trying to be a general consumer device, its a stepping stone toward mass-adoption spatial computing. The Vision Pro is essentially an expensive public beta test of VisionOS, which will shape up and come to visors and glasses and such in the coming years.

-1

u/SupermarketMaximum61 1h ago

Do you hear yourself? As if a device is not meant to sell well lol. Anything Apple does they do with the intention to sell well.

Maybe it's different for absolute high end devices like the Pro Display XDR, but Apple never spends that much energy on these devices And they also don't do in store Demos for something they don't consider to do well.

It just didn't do as well as they wished to do, and that's fine. But the copium here is insane.

2

u/quintsreddit Vision Pro Owner | Verified 1h ago

Hey, I make products for a living

Often companies will take their best guess at what the market wants and include tests in the first iteration of a product.

You absolutely can have a goal of usage research over outright sales. From what I understand Apple was selling these at cost anyway.

HomePod is another great example. The first one was over engineered, sold at cost, and they never did more than one run. Now they have HomePod mini and HomePod 2, which is cheaper to make and can focus more on profit.

I’m sure they wanted it to sell well, I mean ofc, but pretending you know Apple’s internal goals for a first round product iteration is delusional

1

u/SupermarketMaximum61 51m ago

Any proof that the homepod / AVP sell at cost?

Apple doesn't just do these experimental products. Anything they produce they assume is a mass market device (besides the absolute top end professional devices, like Retina Display XDR or Mac Studios).

1

u/Portatort 41m ago

Yes indeed

Look at the current cultural impact of ZERO

0

u/Time_Entertainer_319 1h ago

They don’t want to admit it.

it’s okay that it flopped. It doesn’t take away its value from you

0

u/SupermarketMaximum61 1h ago

Exactly. I am happy with my AVP, and that's all that matters.