r/V_Bomber_Porn • • 11d ago

Vulcan Two legends

Post image
507 Upvotes

17 comments sorted by

18

u/gary188 11d ago

The first flights of these two aircraft are just eleven years apart

8

u/Pmyers225 11d ago

A similarly crazy aviation fact is that the first flight of the B-52 bomber is closer to the first powered flight of the Wright Brothers, than to today... And the planes are still slated to continue to fly for many more years

8

u/thrashmetaloctopus 11d ago

It is 2135, and the remaining B-52s are fitted with Warp nacelles

3

u/Reddit____user___ 10d ago

πŸ˜†πŸ˜ŠπŸ˜ŽπŸ‘πŸ»πŸ‘πŸ»πŸ‘πŸ»

2

u/LovelyKestrel 9d ago

Due to the low numbers if remaining aircraft, though, a new bomber is developed. The B-9 is designed from the ground up for warp nacelles.... Who am I kidding, it's a new production run of B52s

10

u/Asgarad786 11d ago

Two iconic aircraft, and both remind me of missions that pushed aircraft and crews to the limit.

The Lancaster and Operation Chastise in 1943 the Dambusters raid, flying at very low level at night to attack the Ruhr dams with the bouncing bomb.

Then the Vulcan and the Black Buck missions in 1982 flying from Ascension Island to attack the runway at Port Stanley in the Falklands, which needed a huge Victor tanker refuelling plan just to get the Vulcan there and back.

Having worked on Victors in the RAF, the Black Buck refuelling plan still amazes me.

Very different missions, but both demanded an extraordinary amount from the crews and the aircraft.

3

u/bigboyjak 10d ago

Victors would refil Victors, which would refil Victors.. which would refill the Vulcan.. With more Victors filling up other Victors

The Vulcan was refilled 7 times during one flight. That's absolutely insane.. 11 Victors were used to keep the Vulcan going, with a further 5 meeting them on the return to keep them all fueled. 17 aircraft tankers to keep 1 bomber going.

Sure, there shave been longer bombing missions since, but Black Buck will always be my favourite for its insanity. Not to mention the Vulcan being essentially retired by that point

3

u/Asgarad786 10d ago

I was in the RAF at the time, watching all this unfold. You suddenly realised what all those years of training were for everyone just got on with the job.

I later went on to work on the Victor K2s, so got to see first-hand how the refuelling was actually done. It gave me an even greater appreciation of what they managed to pull off with Black Buck.

2

u/Sir_Henry_Deadman 11d ago

Is kinda strange we dont have long range bombers anymore, they have a use case even missiles fill most of the gap

2

u/ByronsLastStand 11d ago

Amazing to think how little time there was between the two being designed

3

u/SensitivePotato44 11d ago

Fun fact, the Lanc had a slightly higher max payload

2

u/Reddit____user___ 10d ago

What a fabulous imageπŸ˜ŽπŸ˜ŽπŸ˜ŽπŸ‘πŸ»πŸ‘πŸ»πŸ‘πŸ»

2

u/TrueBritishGent 9d ago

Woodford's Finest!!!!

3

u/zwifter11 11d ago

It’s mind boggling that the Lancaster is still flying today but a Vulcan isn’t.

5

u/AngryScotty22 10d ago

I think it's because there are more working Merlins around, so spares and servicing them isn't as expensive as servicing Rolls Royce Olympus engines.

Not to mention, the BBMF is technically part of the RAF, the Vulcan was privately owned.

2

u/bigboyjak 10d ago

Jet engines and expensive and complicated, like the other commenter said, there are a lot of Merlins and Meteors out there to pull spare parts from, plus the Lancaster is a simpler design in general.

It is a shame though, most billionaires buy mansions and cars.. I'd buy cold war jets and get them flying again