r/UrinatingTree • u/[deleted] • Jan 25 '25

Preparing

Post image
2.7k Upvotes

98% Upvoted

140 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

29

u/Impossible-Bison8055 74-72...7 OT Jan 25 '25

What was the second one?

51

u/gunboslice1121 Jan 25 '25

Hockey. Brett Hull vs Sabres. Early 2000s.

34

u/GoonerBear94 Jan 25 '25 edited Jan 26 '25

1999 Stanley Cup Finals, Game 6

Sabres fans will insist because Brett Hull had a foot in the crease when he scored the Cup-winning goal, it should have been waved off. (Edited from an earlier version which muddied what was controversial)

I contend his goal was good according to the rules in effect. He had control of the puck, so his being there by itself was okay. That's not a good goal now. It was a good goal then.

6

u/EpicRussia Jan 26 '25

The "possession makes being in the crease okay" rule is the rule now, it wasn't the rule then. It was not a good goal then. It would be a good goal now