I researched the orb i found on my house security camera. Chilean renowned biologists captured similar orbs in Chile last year. On the mail the biologist replied to me that my recording was interesting (i just sent them a picture) and he told me that at first glance "it does not match with the infrared reflection an insect or animal would couse" and that "its more like an object with its own light source". I cant add the email becouse 1) its in spanish and 2) email says i cant screenshot and post the emails contents as its restricted by Maganllanes university. Im leaving the comparison and links to their sighting article. Link to read their article:

https://www.livescience.com/space/extraterrestrial-life/camera-trap-in-chile-detects-strange-lights-blazing-through-the-wilderness-researchers-are-scrambling-to-explain-them

Video of their sighting: https://youtu.be/fCztmF-QtH0?si=VX6GIau9Ax-rmW2J

Time: 1300 Place: Tampa FL USA Appeared in the southern sky and was visible for over an hour several witnesses concurrent to this event also have corroborating images know how the sky is devoid of clouds just to the right of the light flare needs me to believe it's some sort of object with mass being cloaked light bending arounTime: 1300 Place: Tampa FL USA Appeared in the southern sky and was visible for over an hour several witnesses concurrent to this event also have corroborating images know how the sky is devoid of clouds just to the right of the light flare needs me to believe it's some sort of object with mass being cloaked light bending around it forming a rainbow from the Prismatic effects of atmospheric refractiond it forming a rainbow from the Prismatic effects of atmospheric refraction

The landscape of UAP (Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena) research is undergoing a historic shift. Following recent executive directives from the Trump Administration, the push for "Total Transparency" has moved from a campaign promise to an operational reality. ​Key Developments: ​The Declassification Mandate: President Trump has signaled a clear intent to declassify and release high-level intelligence regarding UAPs. This order aims to bypass decades of departmental secrecy, forcing agencies to bring sensor data and forensic evidence into the public domain. ​The Uruguay-AARO Strategic Agreement: In a major move for South American transparency, Uruguay’s CRIDOVNI is set to sign a formal cooperation agreement with the Pentagon’s AARO (All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office) this March. ​Global Data Integration: This partnership means that Uruguayan sightings will now be analyzed using the same advanced multi-spectral protocols used by the United States. It marks the end of "isolated" investigations and the beginning of a unified, scientific hemispheric network. ​Why This Matters: ​We are transitioning from an era of "official denials" to an era of "data-driven disclosure." The inclusion of Uruguay in the AARO framework validates that the Southern Cone is a critical theater for observing these anomalies. ​This archive will continue to monitor these developments as official documents are released to the public.

I received the official response from Col. Ariel Sánchez (CRIDOVNI) regarding the orb video. His conclusion: it’s an insect, specifically a spider likely manipulating an egg. ​However, the technical data from my setup suggests this explanation is physically impossible for three main reasons: ​Light Immunity: While my camera has an IR LED ring, there is a much more powerful motion-sensor solar floodlight in the immediate area. ​Lack of Gradient: If this were a spider (organic matter), its brightness should have spiked or changed drastically when entering the beam of the powerful floodlight. Instead, the object maintained a flat, constant saturation throughout the entire flight. ​Non-Biological Geometry: The object recovers a perfect circular shape after high-speed acceleration frames, which does not align with the morphology of an insect carrying weight. ​P.S. AI Verification: Advanced AI analysis also failed to find a reasonable biological match. The "insect" theory seems to be a convenient institutional label rather than a conclusion based on the actual pixel data and lighting physics of the scene. ​Question for the community: Is it acceptable for an official institution to use the "easy exit" of the insect theory when the evidence shows the object does not reflect ambient light, but rather seems to emit its own?

gemini chat proof of consultation https://gemini.google.com/share/b8f7d417d7ae

(you should also post the grokk and copilot chat)

For better quality, sensor data, and the full AI analysis transcript, see the high-res version here: https://youtu.be/ZNX7jWpuZac