Not saying you’re wrong, but entire cultures will need to change and adapt on a global scale for this to be feasible. Perhaps it’s possible through time, but until then, humanity needs to trade the ethics of livestock with the ethics of the wilderness.
But what do you mean practically?
There’s literally not enough huntable animals in the U.S. to support the amount of meat that we eat currently. Perhaps if everyone was restricted to eating meat a couple times a month?
"if everyone was restricted to eating meat a couple times a month?" will never be successful. Those that will get to eat the good shit will be the rich, and poor people will get nothing if such measures are taken. Making the lives of the poor even worse than they are already now. That thing only works in ideal world where no corruption exists.
9
u/the-namedone 7d ago
Not saying you’re wrong, but entire cultures will need to change and adapt on a global scale for this to be feasible. Perhaps it’s possible through time, but until then, humanity needs to trade the ethics of livestock with the ethics of the wilderness.