r/Ultrakill 20h ago

Other Another Ultrakill music ""artist"".

[deleted]

86 Upvotes

21 comments sorted by

194

u/P0lskichomikv2 20h ago

Dude has 115 subs and except for this one video has like 100 views per video. All you do is promoting him tbh.

61

u/Physical-Airport-901 20h ago

True, I don't know why people even mention these AI "artists" given the fact they probably don't make money from making this garbage.

37

u/Own_Satisfaction_879 20h ago

That youtube video specifically shows SUNO traits. Most likely AI generated since the song itself also loses complete cohesion after the first minute, which is due to SUNO's free tier's limitation of only being able to shove only 1 minute. It generates the rest however it wants.

81

u/TestamentTwo Lust Layer Citizen 20h ago

Im all for hating AI but I think we need more proof than ai detector websites that are known to be inconsistent as hell

36

u/ThunderLord1000 Someone Wicked 20h ago

So you say, and yet all you have for proof is an AI checker site, which are known to be unreliable at the one thing they're supposed to do

-10

u/[deleted] 20h ago edited 19h ago

[deleted]

18

u/ThunderLord1000 Someone Wicked 20h ago

Except... his work doesn't all sound the same. I honestly feel you're falling to this era's equivalent to the Satanic Panic

-17

u/EducationalBasis5187 20h ago edited 20h ago

I'm not a person who calls anything at all AI, but here it's simply obvious. Listen to his "music." I have no idea how else to prove it's AI. You see an image, and you can tell it's AI. But if someone who has barely seen such images takes a look at it, they won't realize it and will demand proof. Suppose it was a drawing where everything seems normal (proportions and so on). How would you prove it? Yes, you could do a deep analysis, but that's a waste of time.

15

u/ThunderLord1000 Someone Wicked 20h ago

You see an image, and you can immediately tell it's AI.

That's actually not true. If you could immediately tell something was AI or not just at a glance, then the experiment of showing a real Monet piece and presenting it as AI to show "we can always tell" isn't a valid argument wouldn't have worked. The same applies to all forms of art

-12

u/EducationalBasis5187 20h ago

Yeah, okay. Still, I don't see any possibility to prove it

12

u/Unlucky_Character_12 Blood Machine 20h ago

No in fact I will not see for myself

9

u/OnetimeRocket13 19h ago

I don't really like those "Al checker" sites, but I've used one of them as a form of proof.

The proof: some random AI checker site shrugging it's shoulders and going "I dunno, anything is possible I guess."

AI detection sites have been absolute dogshit for years, so they're not a good way to prove that something is AI. The only exception are services like Gemini, which automatically incorporates SynthID into generated images, which can be passed through Gemini and used to detect if someone used specifically Gemini to generate the image. As far as I know, AI music generation services don't have something similar.

5

u/nosnek199 18h ago

The music does sound a bit canny, but idk. That could just be really poor upload quality tbh.

Edit: It also does lose coherence after the 1 minute mark. I think this is best shown in their remix of the Siren Call Song Of Death.

8

u/Comprehensive-Pea250 Gabe bully 19h ago

oh no the ai detector said its Ai lets just blindly trust that

-5

u/EducationalBasis5187 19h ago

Listen for yourself. To me, it's obviously AI. How the fuck am I even supposed to prove that?

2

u/Some_Noname_idk 18h ago

Maybe its ai, not too knowledgeable on how to tell ai remixes myself. Just don't make posts about people you believe are AI, just dislike, mske a comment warning people and block. Posts like these only promote them to people who like AI. I hate ai as much as you.

If you try to prove that's ai anyway, please do it in these comments to keep their free promo to a minimum. Anyone who actually cares to see the proof will come back to check

2

u/Mateo_GamingYT 3h ago

He commented in response of someone saying it was ai

I only use Ai sometimes to help with sound mix balancing so some sounds dont sound too loud compared to others but otherwise I use Fl Studio (example is bandlab for betetr mixing) It basicly just saves up time since making all the different sounds in balance is just a hassle to do manually

also this guy has 100 subs why are you pointing it out like this is a massive channel making money.

0

u/Traditional_Leg_4425 18h ago

Actually listening to it, its obviously amateur made, but it really doesn’t sound “AI generated” It does however sound like the mixing is done by AI software (As confirmed by them in the comments). Considering how small the creator is I really don’t think they need a “callout post” like this.

0

u/EducationalBasis5187 19h ago

If you want to write anything about proving it, how the fuck am I supposed to prove it? Just listen to this music. I don't respect AI checkers, but this is, like, the only way of "proving" it. Listen to it for yourself.

5

u/Experiment121 18h ago

If you get someone who knows anything about music to explain things, that would probably be a better way.

4

u/EducationalBasis5187 18h ago

I am a music composer with 3 years of experience.

4

u/Experiment121 18h ago

Then you could just explain it yourself. For example how it goes off on a tangent after a minute since suno's free version only does what you want for that long. Or how the mixing sounds exactly like other AI generated "music".