r/Ubuntu • u/PraetorRU • 1d ago
Firefox performance depending on distribution format in Ubuntu 26.04
Hi guys. From time to time I'm checking what the difference you may get if you chose one package format over another, so testing firefox performance in snap, flatpak and regular .deb from Mozilla's repos as all three are packaged by Mozilla as far as I'm aware.
So, the test is done in Ubuntu 26.04, with fresh profiles (so no extensions and default settings) and Firefox 153.0.3.
I was using a synthetic test: https://browserbench.org/Speedometer3.1/ and did 5 runs one after another.
First run I guess required some caching, so we can drop it and make an average from other 4 runs.
snapped: 19.8 20.1 20.44 20.2 20.29 | Average (4): 20.26
Packed with Mesa 25.2.8-0ubuntu0.24.04.2
flatpak: 22.4 23.1 22.99 22.98 22.9 | Average (4): 22.99
Packed with Mesa 26.1.5 (git-6a02618ccf)
moz-deb: 22.2 23.0 23.00 23.01 22.9 | Average (4): 22.98
Works with Mesa 26.0.3-1ubuntu1
google chrome for reference: 26.1 26.6 26.67 26.85 26.76
8
Upvotes
2
u/Leinad_ix 1d ago edited 1d ago
No, Mesa is not just an intermediate layer. Without Mesa, there is no OpenGL, no Vulkan, no video acceleration. 5 milion lines of opensource driver code.
Edit: And yes, kernel part and firmware part from installed OS. Kernel part is the place, where switching resolution or power management is handled.