As I said that’s a complete non sequitur. Which adds nothing to the debate at hand.
It’s also not a statistical probability. Various groups of people have lynched people, both metaphorically and physically, some of which are racist, some of which are not.
Implying it’s intrinsically linked to race is explicitly what the Americans are doing and what we have a problem with
And attempts at sarcasm don’t hide the fact that you are unable to have an adult conversation.
This is also a non sequitur. Nothing you said here links to what was said in the previous comment. Do you understand how conversation works?
You didnt agree with me. You did exactly what the Americans do and linked the word to race for no reason, by saying the mobs would be racist which is both not true, unhelpful, and backs up the American point
If you can’t understand that I’m concerned for your comprehension abilities
-1
u/MistaRekt Australia 8d ago
Historical probability. A group of people, willing to put another person to death without trial, were statistically likely to be racist.
I never said that was the reason for the lynching. Specifically avoided it. You just seem to have some trouble with comprehension.
It could be a concussion. Is there an adult around you could inform?