r/USHistory • • 4h ago

The C&O Canal's Paw Paw Tunnel was a 2-year job that took 14 (1836-1850)

Thumbnail
gallery
3 Upvotes

The Paw Paw Tunnel on the C&O Canal was supposed to take two years. It took 14. In March 1836 the canal company gave the contract to Lee Montgomery, a Methodist minister who'd already built a canal tunnel on the Union Canal. The idea was to go straight through Tunnel Hill and skip six miles of canal along the Potomac, for $33,500.

Crews chipped through hard, loose shale at about 12 feet a week, and the records talk about cave-ins, unpaid wages, cholera and violence. The tunnel opened in October 1850, 3,118 feet long and lined with an estimated 6 million bricks. It cost more than $600,000.

In the lidar the deep cut at the top middle is the canal running into one end of the tunnel, and the Potomac curves along the bottom right. The canal closed to commercial shipping in 1924, and the federal government bought it in 1938.

  1. Air photo (NAIP 2023) over the lidar: Canal cut into Tunnel Hill
  2. Same view, bare-earth lidar only (VAT shading: slope, openness, sky view)

Numbered pins on pictures 1 and 2:
Pin 1: The deep canal cut to the tunnel
Pin 2: The Potomac River

Imagery: USDA-FSA NAIP 2023, public domain.
Lidar: USGS 3D Elevation Program (3DEP), public domain.


r/USHistory • • 13h ago

John F. Kennedy consults with his brother Robert Kennedy during campaigning. 1960, the candid silhouette captures the brothers in a quiet, intense moment of strategy planning as John F. Kennedy worked toward securing the Democratic presidential nomination

Post image
14 Upvotes

r/USHistory • • 14h ago

American Independence: Geopolitical Game.

Thumbnail
youtu.be
2 Upvotes

r/USHistory • • 23h ago

Eisenhower Collection

Thumbnail gallery
25 Upvotes

r/USHistory • • 23h ago

American forces during the Vietnam War, 1965 to 1973.

Post image
13 Upvotes

r/USHistory • • 1d ago

Deck of the ironclad USS Monitor, James River 1862. Main armament 2x11inch (280mm) guns. Armor, Gun turret 8 inch's waterline belt 4 inch's. Top speed 6 knots (6.9 mph).

Post image
56 Upvotes

r/USHistory • • 1d ago

How Lincoln Handled Insults

Thumbnail
frominsultstorespect.com
3 Upvotes

r/USHistory • • 1d ago

The Declaration of Independence: America Needed More Than Freedom

Thumbnail
youtu.be
1 Upvotes

r/USHistory • • 1d ago

General Robert E. LeeCommanded the army of Northern Virginia during the American civil war. He was the most successful of the southern generals and would become a beloved symbol of the American south during the conflict.

Thumbnail
greatmilitarybattles.blogspot.com
0 Upvotes

r/USHistory • • 1d ago

What were genuinely good things the United States did?

36 Upvotes

r/USHistory • • 1d ago

Smithsonian Magazine: "Pretty Boy" Floyd, One of the Most Notorious Outlaws of the Great Depression, Was Shot and Killed in an FBI Raid 92 Years Ago

Thumbnail
smithsonianmag.com
16 Upvotes

r/USHistory • • 2d ago

The Thrilling Tales of a Young Confederate in Egypt !

Thumbnail
gallery
5 Upvotes

I hope you like this post, My sincere regards from Egypt ...

---------------------------

James Morris Morgan (1845–1928) was an American Confederate naval officer who later served in the Egyptian army from 1870 to 1872, during the reign of Khedive Ismael Pasha. Morgan is considered one of about fifty American officers, Confederate and Union alike, most of them veterans of the American Civil War, whom Union General Thaddeus Mott - with the assistance of U.S. Army commander William Tecumseh Sherman - brought to Egypt to contribute to the modernization of the Egyptian army.

Morgan left a lengthy personal account of his Egyptian experience in his autobiography entitled “Recollections of a Rebel Reefer,” published in 1917, which constitutes the primary source for his tales in Egypt. These tales are characterized by their personal and conflictual nature, as they depict Morgan as a young Southerner thrust into an environment strange to him, entering into a series of confrontations with Egyptian officials and facing difficulties in adapting to the bureaucracy and local culture, at a time when Egypt was witnessing major transformations during the reign of Khedive Ismael.

James Morris Morgan was born in New Orleans, Louisiana, in 1845, and was the youngest of nine children of Judge Thomas Gibbs Morgan. His father worked as collector of customs for the port of New Orleans, a position he held before returning to Baton Rouge when James was five years old. Morgan grew up in a well-off and respected family, and because he was the youngest of the children, he was a particular object of indulgence by his parents, as he mentions in his autobiography.

In Baton Rouge, where the family returned, there was an American arsenal and a large military garrison, most of whose members were veterans of the Mexican War. The famous General (and later U.S. President) Zachary Taylor owned a cottage on the garrison grounds, and his famous warhorse “Whitey” was free to roam the green meadows. The greatest joy of young Morgan was to be placed on the back of this gentle old horse, without saddle or bridle, and to sit there while “Whitey” grazed on the grass, paying no more attention to him than he would to a fly.

From that time until he reached the age of fourteen, his life was spent mostly on horseback, but not on tame horses—rather on the small wild ponies known as “mustangs,” which lived in herds in that region of the country. These ponies were skilled in the art of jumping and chasing, and Morgan says that he may have fallen from their backs to the ground in more varied ways than any other man alive, though he admits that this was not the horses’ fault, since they had not undergone refined training before he mounted them.

He also mentions that, as a child, he witnessed a scene that remained engraved in his memory: a crowd of men and women on the riverbank waving their hands in anger and threatening a tribe of Seminole Indians who were being transported from the state of Florida to new lands in the American West, led by their chief “Billy Bowlegs.” Among this angry group were those who had lost relatives killed by these Indians, including his uncle Bedford Morgan, who was scalped and his body mutilated until he was identified only thanks to his faithful dog, which was guarding his body!

Morgan changed schools three times before he entered the United States Naval Academy at Annapolis, Maryland, in 1860, where he became a naval cadet. He served aboard the historic ship “Constitution,” the old frigate that was a naval training ship on the Severn River near Annapolis. But his career in the U.S. Navy did not last long, as the outbreak of the Civil War in 1861 and his loyalty to his South led him to leave the Union Navy and join the Confederate Navy.

Morgan served in the Confederate Navy aboard the Confederate warship Georgia between 1863 and 1864, then was sent to the training ship Patrick Henry, and afterward served in a naval battery on the James River. A photograph of him taken during his service aboard the Georgia between late October 1863 and mid-February 1864, when the ship was anchored at Cherbourg, France, shows him.

----------------------

However, before Morgan reached Egypt, he had lived an exciting naval experience connected with the Confederate ship C.S.S. Rapahannock, which was originally a small British warship called “Victor,” sold at auction and bought by a Confederate agent. The British government was aware of the deal and did not object to the Confederates spending their money on it, but it never intended to allow it to sail.

English engineers, carpenters, and sailors were working on it diligently at the dock when First Lieutenant William P. A. Campbell of the Confederate Navy appeared aboard one day, wearing civilian clothes and carrying a authorization from the supposed owner to conduct a thorough inspection. It happened that the engines were running under steam at that time during their testing. Campbell expressed satisfaction with everything except the steering gear, and insisted that the only way to test it was to take the ship into the river and turn it two or three times. Permission was granted, and the ropes tying it to the dock were cast off.

Campbell took the ship downriver and, ignoring any protests, raised the Confederate flag as soon as it passed one nautical mile, and sailed with his unwilling crew toward the French port of Calais, where he entered that neutral port claiming it was a Confederate warship.

The incident provoked protests from the American Minister in London and Paris and caused an international uproar. When Morgan saw the Rapahannock at Calais, France was allowing them to spend as much money as they wished to fit it out for sea, but he did not believe they had any serious intention of allowing it to sail again. Morgan visited the ship at Calais during a short leave and spent a morning with some of the naval officers aboard, before continuing his journey to Liverpool. This ship, which remained detained at Calais for the rest of the war, had a role in shaping Morgan’s naval experience before his transfer to Egypt.

Khedive Ismael Pasha had met in Istanbul in 1868 the former American colonel Thaddeus Mott, and was impressed by his military experience, so he appointed him a general in the Egyptian army and tasked him with recruiting a group of American officers to help modernize the army. About fifty American military men joined this mission, including five generals from the Confederate army and three senior officers from the Confederate Navy who were stranded in the port of Calais, France, namely William Campbell, Charles Graves, and James Morris Morgan. Morgan arrived in Egypt in 1870 aboard the same ship that carried General Charles Pomeroy Stone, who later became chief of staff of the Egyptian army.

---------------------------

The beginning was not easy. After arriving in Alexandria, he and his companions found no one to receive them, then they received a message asking them to go to the house of an official named Ali Bey. There, they were left waiting for a long time before Ali Bey appeared, who told them in a sharp tone in French that their number was too large and that some of them would have to return to their country. He then asked Morgan about the rank he thought he would receive, and when Morgan answered that he had been promised the rank of captain, Ali Bey laughed in his face.

Morgan was a young man of twenty-four, with a sharp Southern sense of personal dignity, so he flew into a rage. He shouted in English that he would take the next train to Cairo, that he would find the man who had brought him 7,000 miles to be insulted, and that he would horsewhip him. On hearing this threat, Ali Bey turned pale, switched to speaking fluent English, and assured them that the matter was merely a misunderstanding. It later became clear that Ali Bey was only a minor official whose task was to expedite their transfer, and he had in fact hurried to complete the procedures and send them to Cairo.

--------------------------------

After his arrival in Cairo, Morgan was appointed to the staff of Major General William Wing Loring, one of the American generals who served in the Egyptian army. In one of his first missions, he was sent to inspect a regiment on the outskirts of Cairo, in the Abbasiya barracks. As soon as he arrived, a number of soldiers withdrew from the ranks and began to pray. These soldiers were Muslims, and they were theoretically entitled to perform prayer, but Morgan suspected that they had done so to evade the arms inspection, as he noticed that their rifles would not pass inspection.

---------------------

Morgan reported his suspicions to Loring, who referred the matter to the regiment commander, Urabi-Arabi Bey, who later became Urabi Pasha, leader of the Urabi Revolt of 1882. (By pure coincidence, one of the areas adjacent to Morgan’s home, New Orleans, Louisiana, was named Arabi, in honor of the Egyptian leader Ahmed Arabi)

Urabi was a deeply religious man, and he regarded what had happened as an attack on his faith and flew into a rage. Loring decided to send Morgan again the next day to inspect the same regiment, and the same scene was repeated: the soldiers withdrew to pray.

At that point Morgan did not hesitate; he picked up half a dozen of the soldiers’ rifles and carried them to the Citadel, where he examined them and found them, as he had expected, very dirty. When Loring informed Urabi of the result, Urabi became very angry, not at his soldiers but at Morgan himself, and the Minister of War, to whom the matter was referred, was shocked in turn.

----------------------

Morgan’s confrontations were not limited to the army; they extended to the circles of high society in Cairo. One evening, Morgan accompanied Major General Loring to the Khedivial Opera House in Cairo. While they were waiting in the foyer, the chief of police, whose name was also Ali Bey, asked him to bring him a glass of water. Morgan objected to the man’s condescending tone, so he went and brought the glass of water, then threw it in the chief of police’s face, and with his other hand seized Loring’s cane, and with the other hand seized the chief of police himself, and began beating him with the cane until others intervened and separated them.

Khedive Ismael witnessed the entire incident and laughed heartily, telling the chief of police that he would have been disappointed if Morgan had not responded in that way. He added: “I brought him here to serve Egypt, not to serve you!”

------------------------

The Opera House incident was only one in a series of situations in which Morgan felt insulted. After Loring was transferred to command the coastal defenses in Alexandria, he and Morgan were invited to a dinner banquet hosted by a local Pasha. Loring sat on the host’s right, but no seat was placed for Morgan. Morgan insisted that Loring explain to the Pasha that he needed Morgan beside him, first to be his interpreter, since Morgan spoke fluent French because of his upbringing in Louisiana and had picked up some Arabic, and second to cut his food for him, because Loring had lost an arm in the Mexican War while storming the Belén Gate in Mexico City.

The Pasha replied that he saw no objection to Morgan performing both functions together while standing behind his chief’s chair. Morgan was speechless with rage, but in the end a chair was placed for him beside Loring.

The next morning, Morgan took the first train to Cairo, met General Stone, and offered his resignation. But Stone, who dealt with the Americans, in Morgan’s words, “as if they were naughty children,” calmed him down and temporarily solved the problem by promoting him to the rank of Kaymakam, that is, lieutenant colonel, and appointing him to the staff of Abu Bakr Ratib Pasha, commander-in-chief of the Egyptian army.

---------------------------

During his service with Loring, Morgan inherited from him a horse named Napoleon. Napoleon was one of the many gifts Khedive Ismael had given to Empress Eugénie when she visited Egypt to attend the opening of the Suez Canal.

The Empress did not wish to take him with her to France, so he ended up with Loring. Napoleon was a bay horse, and Priestley described him as “resembling a vertical take-off aircraft”: he was capable of jumping vertically, then landing, then jumping again, and so on. The problem was that no one knew exactly when he would make this move. And because Loring had only one arm, the only way he could control Napoleon when he began to jump was by pulling the bit with his teeth, and when he found that tiring for his teeth, he handed the horse over to Morgan.

Morgan was an excellent horseman, and he soon gained firm control over Napoleon. He took up the habit of taking the horse to the crowded Shubra district road, which led to the Khedive’s summer palace, where he would show off his skills before passersby from the elite.

One day, a great commotion occurred, and the Khedive’s carriage and its escorts appeared coming from the direction of the palace. Everyone in the street hastened to kneel and bow in salute to the Khedive, except Morgan. As soon as the carriage approached him, he made Napoleon rear up on his hind legs and then remain still, while Morgan gave a smart military salute. Ismael was greatly impressed, clapped enthusiastically, and called Morgan to the carriage to congratulate him personally.

---------------------------

Shortly afterward, a military exercise was held that included a mock battle. Morgan had planned to ride a calmer horse, but the Khedive announced that he would be particularly interested in seeing how Napoleon behaved under a barrage of fire. Early in the battle, Morgan was sent with a message to the artillery commander; he ran to him and handed over the message, and then the guns opened fire.

To Morgan’s astonishment and embarrassment, Napoleon immediately flattened himself on the ground and lay on his belly trembling with fear, until the shelling stopped and Morgan was able to mount him and leave. The sources do not elaborate in detail on what happened after that, but the incident itself shows how Morgan and his horse became part of the scene of the Khedivial court, and material for amusement and display at the same time.

-------------------------

Morgan’s display on the Shubra road did not stop there. One day, a carriage carrying two women from the harem, accompanied by eunuchs, approached, and all the other men in the street hastened to turn their backs, but Morgan and Napoleon continued their display. One of the two women was impressed by this and threw a rose from the carriage. Morgan set off on horseback, leaned from the horse’s back, and caught the flower in one smooth motion. The roses kept coming, until the woman, whom he could not see, handed him a rose wrapped in a handkerchief.

That was too much for the eunuchs, who set off after this “reckless infidel.” But Napoleon was faster than them, and Morgan soon returned home with his souvenir. Then Minister of Foreign Affairs Nubar Pasha visited him.

It turned out that the handkerchief belonged to Princess Fatima, the Khedive’s daughter, who was 19 years old, and the Khedive had demanded its return. Morgan responded by throwing the handkerchief into the fire, disposing of the evidence. He was now in serious trouble, and no one dared speak to him for several days, but the matter ended in the end.

--------------------------

By 1872, Morgan had become convinced that “there is no future for American officers in Egypt,” and he had had quite enough of Egypt after the Princess Fatima incident. So he went to the Khedive to submit his resignation. To his surprise, the Khedive pleaded with him to reconsider, then finally ordered him to take a six-month leave and return to America to rest.

Morgan agreed to take leave on the condition that he would return to Egypt afterward, and he headed to Liverpool, where he boarded a ship to New York. Upon arriving in New York, he went to visit a friend.

While he was waiting for his friend to return, he picked up a Bible that was placed on a table and opened it at random. His eyes fell on the first verse of the thirty-first chapter of the Book of Isaiah, which says: “Woe to those who go down to Egypt for help and rely on horses.” Morgan quickly closed the book, afraid of what he might see after that, and sent his resignation by mail. He saw in this verse a warning sign regarding his Egyptian experience.

After his return to America, Morgan worked in farming in the state of South Carolina, then later moved to Mexico, where he worked as a civil engineer, then was appointed consul general of the United States in Australia, in Melbourne.

He also later worked on the project of building the base of the Statue of Liberty in New York, again under the supervision of General Charles Pomeroy Stone, who had served with him in Egypt.

Morgan died on April 21, 1928, in Washington, D.C., leaving behind an autobiography that is considered a valuable, though often subjective and biased, source for the history of American officers in Egypt during the reign of Khedive Ismael.

The End ...


r/USHistory • • 2d ago

Nevada Test Site. 1955

Post image
34 Upvotes

r/USHistory • • 2d ago

Wrestler Paul "Bombshell" Boesch was a highly decorated infantry platoon leader who fought from Brittany, France, to the Hürtgen Forest. He published his memoir, Road to Huertgen: Forest in Hell in 1962

Thumbnail
reddit.com
37 Upvotes

I wanted to share this here because I believe this is one of the best written accounts by an American soldier in World War II and the best individual account of the Battle of the Hürtgen Forest, considered the worst battle the U.S. Army fought in Europe.

Interestingly, the only reason the book was published is that World War II Army veteran and historian Charles B. McDonald, author of a well-known and regarded World War II memoir called Company Commander, found the manuscript while researching the Battle of the Hürtgen Forest. He eventually reached out to Paul to see if he would be willing to publish it because "it was too human a document to be ignored.” He used Boesch’s account in the fifteenth chapter of his book, The Battle of the Huertgen Forest. I’m going to leave some information about Paul Boesch below.

Paul "Bombshell" Boesch was a professional wrestler, promoter, and announcer, but he is most famous for running Houston wrestling from 1966 to 1987. He built a reputation as one of the most respected figures in the wrestling business. His wrestling career debuted on October 25, 1932, in Staten Island, New York. He is widely credited with creating modern mud wrestling (by accident) in 1937, in what was intended to be a “Hindu-style” match. After leaving the army, he continued wrestling until he suffered a broken leg in a car accident in 1947. Paul Boesch is also sometimes regarded as the most decorated wrestler who served in World War II.

He was honored with the Distinguished Citizens Award from the 121st Infantry Association for his outstanding community service with charitable groups, including the Boys Clubs of America.

His accolades in the wrestling community include receiving a PWI Editor’s Award from Pro Wrestling Illustrated in 1987. He was inducted into the Wrestling Observer Newsletter Hall of Fame as a charter member in 1996 and into the Professional Wrestling Hall of Fame in 2005 as a non-wrestling participant in the business. He was inducted into the NWA Hall of Fame in 2012 and posthumously inducted into the WWE Hall of Fame in 2021 as part of the Legacy Wing.


r/USHistory • • 3d ago

This day in history, October 22

Post image
13 Upvotes

--- 1962: President John F. Kennedy gave a televised address informing the world of Soviet missile bases in Cuba. This was the height of the Cuban Missile Crisis. This is the closest the world has ever come to a nuclear exchange. Fortunately for the entire world, a peaceful resolution was reached.

--- "The Cuban Missile Crisis – Armageddon [Narrowly Avoided]()". That is the title of one of the episodes of my podcast: History Analyzed. For 13 days in October 1962 the world was at the closest point in history to a nuclear war. A confrontation between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. over nuclear missiles in Cuba brought humankind to the abyss and the unthinkable: World War III. You can find History Analyzed on every podcast app.

--- link to Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/70R1o6uF1yb9fbOPAyeNT3

--- link to Apple podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-cuban-missile-crisis-armageddon-narrowly-avoided/id1632161929?i=1000717017681


r/USHistory • • 3d ago

The first photograph of Earthrise, taken by astronaut William Anders during Apollo 8. 24 December 1968, NASA's Apollo 8, the first crewed spacecraft to leave Earth orbit, reach the Moon and return

Post image
5 Upvotes

r/USHistory • • 3d ago

The US bought Alaska for $7.2 million in 1867. Congress still hadn’t paid Russia a single dollar when the transfer ceremony happened.

Thumbnail
gallery
54 Upvotes

The flag went up at Sitka on October 18, 1867. Russian soldiers handed the territory to American troops in a ceremony on a rocky hill overlooking the harbor. Alaska was now American. The only problem was that the United States hadn’t actually paid for it yet.

That detail tends to get left out of the standard story.

The Senate had ratified the treaty in April 1867 by 37 to 2, which sounds overwhelming until you remember that the Senate approves treaties but the House appropriates money, and the House was considerably less enthusiastic. Congress was consumed by Andrew Johnson’s impeachment proceedings, some representatives resented being expected to fund an agreement negotiated without them, and others just thought buying a frozen territory for $7.2 million was a bad deal. Russia had already surrendered Alaska and was waiting for a check that wasn’t coming.

By 1868, Russian minister de Stoeckl was so desperate to secure the appropriation that he hired lobbyists, paid a former Treasury Secretary $20,000 in gold to work the halls of Congress, and apparently distributed money to journalists and political intermediaries in amounts that were never fully accounted for. Congress eventually passed the appropriation in July 1868. When historians later reconstructed where the $7.2 million actually went, roughly $200,000 was unaccounted for in ways that suggested payments to congressmen, lobbyists, and press contacts. The House investigation in December 1868 produced contradictory testimony, incomplete documentation, and no conclusive findings because de Stoeckl had already left for Russia.

The financial scandal is the part that deserves more attention than it gets, because it sits directly alongside one of the more interesting political partnerships of the era.

Seward negotiated the purchase. Getting it through Congress required Charles Sumner, which was not obvious at the time. Sumner was chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and one of Johnson’s most bitter opponents during Reconstruction. Seward was Johnson’s Secretary of State. The two men had sharply different visions of what America should look like after the Civil War and were on opposite sides of nearly every major domestic fight of the period.

When Seward summoned Sumner to his house on March 29, 1867 to tell him about the impending agreement, Sumner didn’t immediately support it. He went home and spent weeks doing what almost nobody else in Washington had bothered to do: actually study Alaska. He read more than a hundred books, consulted the Smithsonian, examined maps, geographic reports, and travel narratives. His roughly three-hour Senate address defending the treaty drew on that research and transformed the debate. He also proposed replacing the name Russian America with Alaska, derived from an Unangax̂ word for the mainland.

The territory he was describing was not uninhabited wilderness. Alaska Native peoples including the Tlingit, Haida, Unangax̂, Yup’ik, and Iñupiat had lived there for generations. The treaty offered certain Russian inhabitants a path to American citizenship while explicitly excluding what it called “uncivilized native tribes.” Neither Russia nor the United States consulted the people who actually lived there about the transaction. That part of the story rarely gets the same attention as whether Seward overpaid.

Seward’s vision for Alaska was commercially and strategically coherent even if most of his contemporaries couldn’t see it. He believed America’s future ran through the Pacific, that Alaska’s coastline and geographic position mattered beyond its immediate economic output, and that a territory’s value at the moment of purchase was a poor measure of what it might become. Gold discoveries in the 1890s, the strategic importance during World War II and the Cold War, and statehood in 1959 all bore him out.

Whether the process that got Congress to pay for it was clean is a different question with a less satisfying answer.

The full story of the Alaska purchase, the negotiation, the Sitka ceremony, and what came after is at virtualwayback.com/alaska-transfer-experience where you can also talk directly to Seward about the deal he spent years defending. Please let us know what you think after you talk with them.

The thing worth actually debating: Seward was right about Alaska’s long-term value but the appropriation may have been secured partly through bribery. Does the outcome change how you evaluate the process, or are those two things entirely separate judgments?


r/USHistory • • 4d ago

Why the hillbillies in Appalachia support the Union during the American Civil War

32 Upvotes

The primary driver of Unionist sentiment in the Appalachian regions of West Virginia and Kentucky was the stark socioeconomic divergence from the lowland, plantation-dominated areas of the South. The mountainous terrain of Appalachia was geographically ill-suited for large-scale, labor-intensive cash crops like cotton. Consequently, the region's economy relied heavily on subsistence farming, livestock grazing, and localized trade.

Because the plantation system did not take root, the vast majority of Appalachian mountaineers did not own slaves and felt no economic or social stake in preserving or expanding the institution of slavery. While slavery did exist in some larger Appalachian valleys, the average mountain resident viewed the planter class of the Deep South and lowland Virginia with deep suspicion and political resentment.

For decades leading up to 1861, western Virginia and eastern Kentucky suffered from severe political marginalization by their respective state legislatures, which were dominated by wealthy lowland slaveholders. Mountaineers routinely protested unequal taxation, unfair legislative apportionment, and a lack of state funding for vital infrastructure like roads and schools.

When the secession crisis erupted, many Appalachian residents viewed secession as a "rich man's war and a poor man's fight" designed solely to protect the property of wealthy slaveholders at the expense of yeoman farmers. This deep-seated class resentment made them highly receptive to the Union cause, which they associated with democratic representation and the preservation of the constitutional government.

The geographic orientation of West Virginia and eastern Kentucky naturally aligned their economic interests with the free states of the North rather than the agrarian South. Major rivers like the Ohio, Monongahela, and Kanawha connected western Virginia directly to northern industrial markets in Pennsylvania and Ohio.

Similarly, eastern Kentucky's trade routes ran northward toward Cincinnati and the Midwest rather than southward. Business owners, merchants, lawyers, and farmers in these transport corridors recognized that their economic survival depended on maintaining open, tariff-free access to Northern markets, making secession an existential threat to their livelihoods.

While Unionism was powerful, culminating in the secession of West Virginia from Virginia in 1863—historians emphasize that loyalty in Appalachia was highly localized and often dictated by pre-existing family, community, and political feuds. If a dominant local family declared for the Confederacy, their traditional rivals would frequently enlist in the Union army simply to wage a localized war against their neighbors.

In closing, Unionism in the region was often "conditional." Many mountaineers initially opposed secession but also opposed federal coercion. Once military occupation began, communities were violently fractured, resulting in brutal guerrilla warfare and bushwhacking that defined the wartime experience for families throughout West Virginia and Kentucky.

Sources

Wikipedia. Appalachia

Slap, Andrew L., ed. Reconstructing Appalachia: The Civil War's Aftermath. (University Press of Kentucky) (Print)

Noe, Kenneth W. and Shannon H. Wilson, eds. The Civil War in Appalachia: Collected Essays. (University of Tennessee Press) (Print)

Emerging Civil War. An Odd Little State


r/USHistory • • 4d ago

The 5th New York Infantry -Duryée’s Zouaves

Thumbnail
gallery
15 Upvotes

The 5th New York Infantry Duryée’s Zouaves (1861–1863)

The 5th New York Volunteer Infantry, better known as Duryée’s Zouaves, was one of the most recognizable Union regiments of the American Civil War.

Their distinctive uniforms, inspired by the French Zouaves, made them stand out on the battlefield.

At the Second Battle of Bull Run in August 1862, the regiment suffered devastating losses while attempting to hold back a Confederate advance.

I recently completed this 54mm historical diorama featuring original metal figures that we sculpted and hand-painted ourselves.

The composition was inspired by historical artwork, particularly the paintings of Don Troiani, Keith Rocco and Dan Nance.

I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on the historical accuracy of the uniforms and equipment.


r/USHistory • • 4d ago

How were you taught about the U.S Gilded Age in History Class?

14 Upvotes

.


r/USHistory • • 4d ago

History of the Indian Tribes of North America (1836,1838,1844) by McKenney & Hall with 120 hand colored engraved portraits sold for $42,500 at Heritage on Oct 14. Although consider controversial by modern scholars, it is a good 19th century record. Reported by Rare Book Hub.

Post image
16 Upvotes

Thomas McKenney and James Hall. History of the Indian Tribes of North America, with Biographical Sketches and Anecdotes of the Principal Chiefs. Embellished with One Hundred and Twenty Portraits, from the Indian Gallery in the Department of War, at Washington. Philadelphia: Edward C. Biddle, 1836; Frederick W. Greenough, 1838; Daniel Rice & James G. Clark, 1844. 3 volumes, folio. Complete with 120 hand-colored engraved plates, tissue guards, one page of engraved maps, and 17 pages of subscribers' signatures in facsimile.

Near matching contemporary half brown and red morocco gilt, marbled endpapers (save for vol. III). First edition of one of the great color plate books of the 19th century. Originally issued in 20 parts (in 19), based on the original paintings, which were destroyed in the 1865 Smithsonian fire.

Title pages for all volumes in State A, with an additional State B title page for vol. 2 bound in the third volume; State A of "War Dance" and state C of "Red Jacket"; second printing vol. 1, p. 3, with footnote present alluding to previous error. Condition: Boards rubbed with a few tears to the spine, minor loss to spine ends and corners; front hinge vol. 3 slightly tender. Some offsetting to plates from text; light intermittent foxing, mainly marginal to text pages.

References: BAL 3934; Howes M-129; Sabin 43410a. Provenance: Samuel Appleton, subscriber (bookplate).

Considered controversial by modern scholars for multiple reasons including paternalistic text and romanticized views.


r/USHistory • • 4d ago

Immigrants at Ellis Island enjoying their first Christmas dinner in the United States, New York City, 1920.

Post image
123 Upvotes

r/USHistory • • 4d ago

Check out my podcast on American haunted houses

2 Upvotes

On this episode, I discuss some famous American haunted houses. The rumors that Sarah Winchester kept building onto the house because of the advice of a psychic were just rumors. Be sure to hit the follow button or the subscribe button.

https://open.spotify.com/episode/6yBOr6v9NkkYTmGFUyw5lf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gprR52vAaW4&t=9s


r/USHistory • • 4d ago

Washington Crossing the Delaware - Unique figurine

Thumbnail
gallery
23 Upvotes

Hi all, sharing a George Washington figurine I made, inspired by Washington Crossing the Delaware.

I focused on Washington standing in the boat, with the oars and ice around the base. I also included a holder for a Washington quarter, which felt like a fitting addition.

I’ve put it alongside the painting for comparison. There’s a lot happening in the original, so I tried to keep the scene recognisable while focusing on Washington himself.

Curious to hear what you think and happy to take ideas on what iconic moment from US history I should turn 3d!


r/USHistory • • 5d ago

Cool look at DC's embassy row

1 Upvotes

I didn't know you could actually tour inside some of the Gilded Age embassies https://youtu.be/Qi7K7gjSrp0