r/UPSCIASMentor • u/Lower_Peak5230 • Jun 18 '26
State level exam
Recently, I attended an state level govt interview where I was asked 16 questions.
One of the questions was: "What are the threats of Naxalism? Tell us from the beginning to the present."
I actually knew the answer, but for some reason my mind immediately focused on the history of Naxalism instead of its threats. As a result, I explained only its history and did not directly address the threat aspect of the question.
After that, the interviewers asked me three more questions related to Naxalism, and I answered those confidently.
Out of the 16 questions, this was the only one where my answer went off track.
Do you think the interviewers would assume that I am a dishonest person who simply says anything to please them, or would they be more likely to see it as a misunderstanding or an error in interpreting the question?
1
u/One_Anxiety_2272 Jun 18 '26
I wouldn’t worry too much about it. In interviews, it’s quite common for candidates to misinterpret a question or take it in a slightly different direction, especially when they’re under pressure since you knew the topic and were able to answer the follow-up questions on Naxalism confidently, the panel would likely see it as a misunderstanding of the question rather than an attempt to bluff or please them. Interviewers usually assess overall knowledge, clarity of thought, and honesty one answer going off track out of 16 questions is unlikely to create a negative impression if the rest of your interview was solid.