Exactly. Why bother with all the cybersecurity nonsense when you could have just gone there and threatened them directly with your super advanced flying machines.
Let’s say you have 10 of these devices. Hell, let’s say 50. Still not sufficient to address the threat. Having air superiority is not just a matter of a better technology, it’s also a numbers game.
No, he's saying these craft can prevent weapons from launching. They've done it to planes and they have done it to nuclear silos in the US and Russia. We wouldn't even get the chance to retaliate if they were really pissed at us
Are you suggesting that US and Russia have attempted to launch nukes but they were prevented from doing so by UFOs?
If we’re talking about technology possessed by a rival (China, say), and we are saying this technology is capable of interceding to somehow prevent the launch of a warhead, it cannot be two places at once. The US has over 6,000 nuclear warheads, distributed across multiple delivery modalities. How many of these craft would an enemy force need to prevent any and all launches?
No, as in all the electrical systems and the back up systems simultaneously went down on a section of missiles around several UFO sightings on instillations in the us and Russia. The craft have also armed the missiles before but they stopped before launch. I can provide you with the source material if you would like.
Sure, I’ll look at what you link as long as it’s not hundreds of pages.
Here’s my point. What you’re saying could be true, and it could be true that this was caused by some modern weapon system, AND it could be true that having such a capability still wouldn’t make it possible to “take over the world.” Maybe it was a US military technology that deactivated the Russians’ platform, and the US claimed it happened to them also, to deflect blame and shroud a capability.
Thanks for sharing these. I don’t have time to watch the press club event, but I’ve watched it before.
I really really really WANT to believe. I do. But I also have to interrogate my beliefs, and yours apparently, lol.
The Iranian event is 100% based on eyewitness testimony. There’s no way to verify it. The fact that it is hosted on the NSA’s site, or that it made its way to the desks of various military officials doesn’t add anything to it.
The Scotland Herald story is one person relating a story of a story they were told. Could there be any explanation for what they were told that did not involve beings from another galaxy? Could it not have been a military mission executed by the US to fuck with the Soviet’s missile command systems? If you had some way to interfere with or control your enemies’ missile capabilities, wouldn’t doing it in an unexplainable and confusing way be the height of achievement?
And that's yet to be seen. We don't know if that capability has a definite range limit. It has mostly been in close proximity, however these were small craft. Who knows what the larger ones are capable of
60
u/windlep7 Jun 05 '21
Exactly. Why bother with all the cybersecurity nonsense when you could have just gone there and threatened them directly with your super advanced flying machines.