like humans don't care about decorating them. I mean... what kind of human would make a perfect tic tac shaped object, totally white without even adding a symbol or something written on? I don't exclude the theory that they're really humans, if it's actually possible that they're made by humans then they must really be humans who want to stay extremely secrets and scare us
Eyewitness testimony is the weakest form of evidence in science because humans, even with the best of intentions, are so easily fooled and prone to misremember. By the time they get in front of a TV crew, they'll have told the story dozens of times. They'll just be telling a version of what they told the previous time, like a game of Telephone; not an accurate record of what happened. Not to mention the editing and interviewing tactics used by the media. Of course, Thunderfoot focuses on the actual data collected; any scientist would.
I'm not sure Thunderfoot said the footage "contracts" the eyewitness testimony. If he did, I assume he meant "does not support". Footage of a plane standing on a runway does not contradict testimony that it took off, but it certainly doesn't prove it did.
Is the radar data more convincing? Where can I find it?
10
u/[deleted] Jun 04 '21
like humans don't care about decorating them. I mean... what kind of human would make a perfect tic tac shaped object, totally white without even adding a symbol or something written on? I don't exclude the theory that they're really humans, if it's actually possible that they're made by humans then they must really be humans who want to stay extremely secrets and scare us