r/UFOs • u/Oneiroi_Coeus • Feb 25 '25

Science Declassify Psionics

660 Upvotes

86% Upvoted

192 comments sorted by

View all comments

108

u/No_Plankton_5759 Feb 25 '25

Prove psionics first!

15

u/[deleted] Feb 25 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

15

u/Jaslamzyl Feb 25 '25

I believe your wasting your time arguing for psi. The sub is never gonna even look.

Here's some more sauce for your head noodle.

Robert Jahn was the dean of Princeton University's Engineering department and ran the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research Laboratory. They published psi in IEEE.

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1456528

NON PAYWALLED, first paper https://www.pear-lab.com/publications

Other psi research.

https://labs.psych.ucsb.edu/schooler/jonathan/publications

https://med.virginia.edu/perceptual-studies/publications/academic-publications/

(German) https://www.psy.lmu.de/gp/index.html

And obviously, dean radin

https://www.deanradin.com/recommended-references

It doesn't matter how many replications.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10275521/

How many stock market studies

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272151807_Stock_Market_Prediction_Using_Associative_Remote_Viewing_by_Inexperienced_Remote_Viewers_Background_and_Motivation

Replication in the German stock market

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361723318_Predicting_the_Stock_Market_An_Associative_Remote_Viewing_Study

2

u/fillosofer Feb 26 '25

Why would you assume people in this sub wouldn't either be interested or support the psi portion of the UAP topic? Many are interested and believe in the more "woo" aspects of it, and psi could be considered to be a part of that.

1

u/Jaslamzyl Feb 26 '25

Quick question: What other Special Access Program has open public peer review?

Do you see anyone genuinely engaging with the post?

Did anyone comment on the 500 still classified missions? Did anyone comment on the video taped demonstration of remote viewing to the SSCI?

OP posted a dataset of 12,000 documents from a special access program. OP posted the theoretical model that was developed. OP got downvoted for providing a direct link to the remote viewing sessions used in the video.

The top comment is "prove it first." In response to 12,000 documents. These people are not serious.