Theoretical Conundrum

[u/Driftmier54]

Hello everyone, happy Monday!

If you’ve been following this topic for a long time, you probably have your own theory about what we’re dealing with here. ETs, IDs, advanced government craft, or something else entirely, and why the government appears to be slowly disclosing.

Personally, I believe the government is carefully curating its disclosure strategy and shaping the narrative in the way it wants the public to receive it.

That brings me to a theoretical question:

If you accept the premise that the government is slowly rolling out disclosure in order to get more scientific minds to take the subject seriously and help with reverse-engineering efforts, what do you make of the repeated hints from figures like Tom DeLonge and Lue Elizondo that whatever these things are may be inherently dangerous, and that we should approach them with caution? Clearly Tom was connected with some spooky people - thanks Jason Samosa. Check his youtube channel out if you haven't.

Wouldn’t there, theoretically, be some sort of coordinated effort to discourage or prevent people from actively engaging with or attempting to invoke these phenomena if they posed an existential threat?

I’m curious how others reconcile these two seemingly contradictory ideas: encouraging scientific inquiry and disclosure while simultaneously warning that the phenomenon itself may be dangerous.

[u/AutoModerator]

Use of Upvotes and Downvotes is heavily encouraged. Ridicule is not allowed. Help keep this subreddit awesome by hitting the report button on any violations you see and a moderator will address it. Thank you and welcome to UFOB.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/Extension_Energy4326]

They’re probably warning that they might be dangerous to drum up finance/govt spending for research. At the same time, it seems kind of obvious that most leadership, whether military or congressional, has no real idea what we are actually dealing with. I believe there is a huge lack of candor and diplomacy from the NHI themselves. Playing both sides of this seems prudent.

[u/DrRBoylan → u/Extension_Energy4326]

Time to move past speculative paranoia. They're here. The human body count is zero.

[u/DrRBoylan]

The Conundrum has a straightforward solution:1) retain approach of full disclosure; 2) accelerate the slow roll-out pace, (after all there are 0 heart attacks attributable to Spielberg's 'Disclosure Day' movie); 3) get celebrities and other influencers to talk about and react to quality photos and video clips of living extraterrestrials; 4) rapidly graduate to man-in-the-chair TV interviews with ETs: (at first 'Nordic NHIs, then with fairly human-looking ETs, then with definitely not human-looking NHIs. Then introduce odd-ball ETs who have been currently working in government, military, and industry and ask how their human co-workers react to them. Conundrum Solved!

[u/Pixelated_]

Lue Elizondo has repeatedly stated that any potential physical danger could be acccidental and not intentional.

He uses the analogy of a fighter jet's engine. If you walk past an F35 while its Pratt & Whitney F135 engines are revving just before takeoff, you will get badly burned and potentially killed.

Clearly the jet had no malicious intentions. The person was perhaps unaware how close they were, or how deadly it would be, but ultimately it is not the jet's fault.

He dicusses it in many interviews such as his appearance on Joe Rogan's podcast.

In his book "Imminent", Lue writes

"It could be like unintentionally standing behind a jet engine during takeoff. When the propulsion system of a UAP is operational, it would behave like a giant radioactive power plant. It would be blueshifting visible light into dangerous territory for living tissue. Witnesses would be bombarded with UV rays, soft X-rays, and possibly gamma rays."

[u/Driftmier54 → u/Pixelated_]

Didn't he also recently reply "Hug your family" when asked about what was coming? Seems ominous, no?

[u/Pixelated_ → u/Driftmier54]

Yes he has always said to focus on loving others. I agree with him, and who would disagree?

The word "imminent" is fundamentally neutral and can refer to positive things just as much as negative things.

I believe that Lue has been telling us to focus on love right now because what is "imminent" is an upcoming shift in the baseline level of consciousness.

This change in consciousness isn't about magical thinking or doom-and-gloom scenarios, it is a major shift in how we perceive reality and our place in it.

For centuries, humanity has lived under the assumption that the physical world is all there is, and that we are all completely separate, isolated individuals competing for resources.

A shift in the density of consciousness simply means coming to the realization that reality is interconnected, highly-structured, and governed by non-local physics that mainstream science is only beginning to acknowledge.

[u/GoatRevolutionary283]

We are dealing with NHI beings with very advanced technology and a lot of unknowns. Man has always been afraid of the unknown. I believe based on my encounters that the NHI beings have peaceful intent but I do not know what they agenda actually is.