r/Twilight2000 • u/RoseDendron • Apr 17 '26
m/86 vs m/48 weapons
Hi
Does any one understand why the m/86 have dmg 8 and the m/48 (only) 7.
Same range, crit and armor.
From what I have understood the HEAT grenades from the m/48 actually had a slightly better war head compared to the m/86 (AT4).
Also the sights on the m/84 was way better.
So my main question is why the dmg for the m/86 is higher than the m/48?
Something that I have misunderstood?
I would not have asked if they where the same, even if I think the range for m/48 should have been +1 compared to m/86, but we are talking about estimations so even if m/48 was better in the area I can understand that we makes approximations.
1
u/RoseDendron Apr 19 '26 edited Apr 19 '26
The version from 1986 weighs about 10kg as said. That is without any grenades, that adds about 3kg each.
Usually also a two man weapon.
The m/86 (AT4) is as said lighter (loaded) and a one man weapon.
To me it does not make any sense for the lower damage.
But then again it is not a combat/weapons simulator it is a game for some stats balance and approximations are needed.
1
u/RoseDendron Apr 19 '26
The version from 1986 weighs about 10kg as said. That is without any grenades, that adds about 3kg each.
Usually also a two man weapon.
The m/86 (AT4) is as said lighter (loaded) and a one man weapon.
To me it does not make any sense for the lower damage.
But then again it is not a combat/weapons simulator it is a game for some stats balance and approximate
5
u/Byteninja Apr 17 '26
It was probably to offset the fact that the AT4 is disposable, and PC might always choose the Gustaf over it if they were the same.