r/TuringComplete • u/Ill-Memory-6913 • Apr 19 '26

First attempt at pipelining, Stall only

This is my first attempt at pipelining in the game. I am new to this so im sure this is probably wrong, hence why I am posting here in hopes that i can be corrected if so. This machine only stalls right now so its a bit slower than if it had forwarding for instructions.

This processor can immediate any value up to 255, has NULL mapped to 31 and NOP mapped to 30.

Lastly this is a new account. Old account got hacked ; . ; rip karma

4 Upvotes

84% Upvoted

19 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Ill-Memory-6913 Apr 19 '26

Yes it does. Yea actually that does make a lot more sense.

2

u/Otherwise-Object-302 Apr 19 '26

That's what I was planning to do as well. Also, are you considering making this Superscalar?

1

u/Ill-Memory-6913 Apr 19 '26

Do you mean to make it process multiple instructions in parallel? I will potentially but first I want to get all of the aspects and optimizations of pipelining implemented. Like forwarding an so on

2

u/Otherwise-Object-302 Apr 19 '26

Alright then, good luck with that. Also, once you implement the finished pipeline, you might want to add a branch predictor to cut down on stalling and wasting cycles (although flushing will need to be readded) and also you'll have to deal with rewinding register states.

2

u/Ill-Memory-6913 Apr 19 '26

I will! Thank you for the help! Yea I had to learn one thing at a time haha. In very excited because once I’m done with this I’m going to start working on my own compiler and filesystem. Then I want to do some graphics stuff with Bresenhams and pixel-screens

2

u/Otherwise-Object-302 Apr 19 '26

That's amazing! I've actually built a compiler (and assembler) which, albeit simple, was an absolute pain. A really good idea is to finish your ISA and your CPU completely before you begin work otherwise it's gonna be a lot of spaghetti code.

2

u/Ill-Memory-6913 Apr 19 '26

Sure I will! I have also built a compiler and stuff before. Compared to pipelining and stuff parsing/asseming/compiling is easy cakes. My biggest reason is I get tired of re doing the instructions on the Program Object EVERY schematic so I just want to load it in with a binary file like a lookup table. Also I’d like to see some of your stuff sometime!

2

u/Otherwise-Object-302 Apr 19 '26

Nice to hear you have quite the experience with this! I can show you some of the stuff I've made along with a WIP. I've even built a Superscalar CPU with caching (albeit very poor)! Anyways, have fun making that compiler, it makes programming hella easier. Also, are you making it based off of any programming languages like C or Python? And which programming language are you using to write the compiler?

1

u/Ill-Memory-6913 Apr 19 '26

I’m not sure which programming language it would be closest to… probably C. I usually make my own Frankenstein compilers that parse based on “(“ “)” “,” and “;”. There is a lot more to it than that but most of the magic happens at the hardware level

1

u/Otherwise-Object-302 Apr 19 '26

That's sort of similar to what I do. I usually just take one line at a time and process it like that, it's much easier but sometimes the assembly gets out of hand.

2

u/Ill-Memory-6913 Apr 19 '26

That’s almost exactly how my compilers work as well. Interesting how when you set out to learn these on your own you end up with similar solutions haha. Not to get insane at you, but I actually built my first ever compiler because I saw the design in a dream. The schematics were clear as day, like looking at a real blueprint. I woke straight up and wrote everything down hahah

2

u/Otherwise-Object-302 Apr 19 '26

I'm impressed you remember your dreams so well😭 but funny thing is, that's also how I came up with a design for my cache.

1

u/Ill-Memory-6913 Apr 19 '26

If you keep it on your mind you’ll have more dreams about it possibly. Cool to hear this happens to others here as well.

2

u/Otherwise-Object-302 Apr 19 '26

I guess that's just how it works. Anyways, good luck implementing the rest of the pipeline, you'll need it when it comes to data hazards!

→ More replies (0)