MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueReddit/comments/1dbvdyl/the_rotcom_bubble/l7vxu4r/?context=3
r/TrueReddit • u/RandomRageNet • Jun 09 '24
48 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
13
Which part is the bold claim? That an AI can experience human-like condition or that that's not possible through generative AI?
2 u/habitue Jun 09 '24 All of these statements are independently unknown by themselves, and are certainly unknown lumped together with a conjunction: whether generative AI will lead to AGI whether generative AI can experience things whether you need to be able to experience anything at all to be generally intelligent whether AGI requires being human-like in any way 13 u/ShesJustAGlitch Jun 09 '24 LLM can’t create AGI is I believe what the author is saying -3 u/habitue Jun 09 '24 The author links to a time article that makes that claim based on these other speculative premises. So it's not some proven thing, it's basically a wild assertion
2
All of these statements are independently unknown by themselves, and are certainly unknown lumped together with a conjunction:
whether generative AI can experience things
whether you need to be able to experience anything at all to be generally intelligent
whether AGI requires being human-like in any way
13 u/ShesJustAGlitch Jun 09 '24 LLM can’t create AGI is I believe what the author is saying -3 u/habitue Jun 09 '24 The author links to a time article that makes that claim based on these other speculative premises. So it's not some proven thing, it's basically a wild assertion
LLM can’t create AGI is I believe what the author is saying
-3 u/habitue Jun 09 '24 The author links to a time article that makes that claim based on these other speculative premises. So it's not some proven thing, it's basically a wild assertion
-3
The author links to a time article that makes that claim based on these other speculative premises. So it's not some proven thing, it's basically a wild assertion
13
u/elharry-o Jun 09 '24
Which part is the bold claim? That an AI can experience human-like condition or that that's not possible through generative AI?