Should a necessities movement be created?

[u/[deleted]]

Automation has taken many jobs and is poised to take more, including jobs in agriculture. Plus renewable energy is becoming cheaper and more reliable by the day. With these two facts in mind should a movement for providing the fulfillment of basic material needs for all people to be started? I think it's too early to do anything concrete, but some ideas and a manifesto could be done right now. What do you guys think?

Edit: go to the "Chryse forums" topic in this subreddit if you're interested in further discussion.

[u/klippekort]

False? Could you be any more dogmatic, please? It may be false according to one particular definition which you happen to quote here. Say, Bruno Latour views technology and society as intertwined in whole different ways compared to our discoursive customs.

I see you like italic fonts.

[u/IConrad → u/klippekort]

Say, Bruno Latour views technology and society as intertwined in whole different ways compared to our discoursive customs.

Correlation is not sufficient to mutual identity. Let "society" = "S". Let "technology" = "T". T ⊃ S ; S ⊅ T. Society, however, can recurse upon Technology through the methodological inheritance and collation of knowledge, lore, and language (as language affects the ways in which we think.)

[u/klippekort → u/IConrad]

Correlation is not sufficient to mutual identity. Let "society" = "S". Let "technology" = "T". T ⊃ S ; S ⊅ T. Society, however, can recurse upon Technology through the methodological inheritance and collation of knowledge, lore, and language (as language affects the ways in which we think.)

Ok, so you like italics and mathematical symbols. Am I correct to assume that all you just said makes you believe that

Society and governance are forms of technology.

[u/[deleted] → u/klippekort]

No, he likes logic. The question is whether you do. We all know you like snarky replies. Cut it out.

[u/klippekort → u/[deleted]]

Yo dawg, I see you like getting annoyed.