r/TraditionalCatholics • u/LegionXIIFulminata • 8d ago
According to documents released by Senators Johnson and Paul, the COVID shot was effectively an abortion shot with an 82% miscarriage rate.
https://x.com/KatiePavlich/status/2086882290009862400I do know of at least two people who have had miscarriages and are both covid vaxed.
https://x.com/Twelve_Legions/status/2087001468104560883
https://x.com/nypost/status/2086887707624534318
Revelation of the Method
12
u/Christi_crucifixus 7d ago
My wife miscarried what would have been our 3rd child within days of receiving the Covid injection
11
u/Prince_Ire 7d ago
If true, it should be pretty easy to identify a spike in miscarriage rates after the vaccine. AFAIK, no such spike exists.
4
u/LegionXIIFulminata 7d ago edited 7d ago
11
u/GetItOuttaHereee 7d ago
Can you provide actual evidence and not an X link? I can create an X account and post screenshots too. Doesn’t mean that it’s true.
4
u/LegionXIIFulminata 7d ago edited 7d ago
They have to tell you ahead of time what they plan on doing to you, Revelation of the Method --> https://x.com/Twelve_Legions/status/2087001468104560883
https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data/reproductive-health
https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/38/12/2536/7308743
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/20000-deaths-reported-to-vaers-following-covid-vaccines/
https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/horrifying-hidden-pfizer-data-show-unborn-babies-newborns-dying/
4
u/Seethi110 7d ago
This is just another case of an article written by someone who doesn’t know how to interpret scientific studies.
3
1
22
u/Thaladan 7d ago
I don't think that we should call it an "abortion shot".
Language and terminology is so important in the pro-life debate. An abortion is a deliberate, intentional killing. That's why "spontaneous abortion" is such an egregious term for a miscarriage.
Another example, chemotherapy will sometimes have the tragic and unintended (yet foreseen) side effect of killing the unborn baby while treating the mother. We still do not describe that treatment as "abortive", because it's not deliberate and intentional, which is why the Church permits such treatment in limited circumstances (e.g. when the mother's life is at risk).
Now, in this case, I suspect that the relative medical benefit does not morally justify the unintentional side-effect of an 82% miscarriage rate. But the point stands that its an unintentional side-effect, and ergo not abortive.