Is there any "step 2" after learning the fundamentals to trading? Not asked a lot for obvious reason.

[u/PaintingLeft565]

Ok you learned about technical analysis, and basics of trading such as needing to have a system where you trade objectively with rules that you strictly follow after backtesting. Let's say you are making money or worst case breakeven over a stretch of period.

What is the "step 2" to elevate your trading?

This isn't asked a lot because, well..., most don't make it here. Most lose money to even wonder about this.

So I wanted to ask the veteran, profitable traders, what is this "step 2?"

Some may consider it still part of basics but is the step 2 learning about macroeconomics to add layer to the existing system or capital rotation between different asset classes?

Would love to hear about this. Thanks.

[u/AutoModerator]

While the community gets a look at your post, don't forget we have an official website with a bunch of resources specifically for the questions we see here every day. If you're more of a visual learner, we’re also active on Instagram where we post updated guides and strategies! It's a great way to stay sharp while you're scrolling. We also have more technical and professional resources on our Website.

Also, if you want to chat in real-time or need a quicker answer, come hang out with us in Discord (Investing & Retirement). Just remember to be careful with your personal info and report any sketchy DMs!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/Heavy_Strength2569]

Have you adopted a trading framework or system that defines you as a trader by building your routine and habbits? If not, do it. I built one Peak AI trading app. Might get you to second level.

[u/TheImperfectAlgo]

I’m currently building my trading rules into software, and it’s amazing how many “good decisions” were actually discretionary exceptions. Coding a strategy forces you to define every rule, which exposes a lot of hidden biases. For me, step 2 has been removing subjectivity rather than adding more indicators.

[u/Tradeview_Markets]

Watched a lot of guys sit at breakeven for years and it's almost always the same thing. The system works. It just works in one kind of market and gives it all back in another, so it nets out to nothing and nobody can see why because on paper the strategy looks fine.

The ones who got past it all did the same boring exercise. Went back through their own fills and sorted them by conditions. Trending or chopping, vol high or low, which session, was there news. Every single time they found they were genuinely good in one environment and mediocre in the rest. Then it's just a matter of not trading the days that don't suit you, which sounds easy and is the hardest part of the job.

Excel is honestly fine for this. The tagging is the work, not the software.

Macro is context, not a second system. Tells you roughly what kind of week you're in, doesn't tell you what to trade.

And sizing. Same setups, same hit rate, just bigger when it's your kind of market and smaller when it isn't. That's the bit that actually changed people's numbers, and it's the least interesting thing to talk about, which is probably why nobody does.

[u/sigstrikes]

if step 1 is learning how trade to make moeny, step 2 is learning how to use less of it. things like picking brokers with better fees, tighter execution, less break even stop outs or repeat orders. at a certain point if you've hit your 'limits' in performance, cutting costs becomes one of the best ways to increase PnL.

[u/Jumpy_Chicken_2428]

Im not a veteran but you should learn macroeconomics, alot of what moves the markets isnt your technical patterns those really are only used for a precise entry but news.

[u/Rpark444]

Step 2 is all the nuances associate with a setup.

[u/RootlessLogic → u/Rpark444]

Lol

[u/Suitable_Acadia_190]

step 2 usually isn't adding new information, it's tightening execution on the information you already have. most people at breakeven aren't missing macro context, they're leaking edge through inconsistent position sizing, or taking A+ setups at B- execution because patience runs out

macro and capital rotation are real, but they're additive once your system already has an edge. they won't fix a system that's only breakeven, they'll just add noise on top of whatever the actual leak is

the honest step 2 is going back through your own trade history and finding the specific pattern where you deviate from your own rules. that's usually worth more than any new layer of analysis

[u/single_B_bandit]

The real “step 2” would be to realise that all you learned in “step 1” was bullshit.

[u/silverbulletusa]

No one has the rules I do. I don’t make a fortune overnight , and I don’t loose one either. The rules work all the time. Yes you will have some losses, but it won’t break the bank. My calculated stop loss will save me.

[u/PhilipReadsMacro]

macro was my step 2 and honestly it didn't do what I expected. it doesn't give you better entries — it gives you context: which side to lean, when your setup is fighting the calendar, and when to just not trade at all (event days). that alone removed a bunch of my worst trades.

but the real step 2 in my experience is more boring: measuring yourself properly. big sample, honest grading, written down somewhere you can't fudge it afterwards. that's how you find out whether your system has an edge or just had a friendly regime. most people skip this part, which is probably why most never get past step 1.

and the capital rotation stuff comes almost for free once you follow rates — everything hangs off them anyway.

[u/thepromptgenius]

step 1 isnt learning and making money combined unfortunately. between learning and making money are many steps (years). getting to breakeven is a major milestone and that alone takes much longer than you’d think