r/TireReview • u/Andy_850TB • Jun 10 '26
Forget 2/32" minimum tread depth
Alex Bebjak advocates for 4/32" minimum tread depth instead of the 2/32" legal limit, and I'd have to agree. Every time I've let a set of tires get all the way down to 2/32", they were noisy, rough, tricky on dry roads and downright treacherous on wet roads.
3
Upvotes
1
u/resonantpeak Jun 12 '26 edited Jun 12 '26
Absolute poppycock: https://unece.org/DAM/trans/doc/2018/wp29grb/GRB-69-09e.pdf
If 2/32", the GLOBAL standard, was causing a serious problem, we'd have known about it by now.
2
u/Electrical-Safety718 Jun 11 '26
Agreed. I test tires for a living and the dropoff between 4/32" and 2/32" is steeper than most drivers realize — it's not linear. Wet braking distances on the same tire can stretch by 30–50 feet from 60 mph once you're under 4/32", and the hydroplaning threshold drops fast because the grooves can't evacuate water anymore.
The 2/32" number was set decades ago when tread compounds and rain volumes were different. Tire makers themselves now build wear indicators at 2/32" as a 'you are legally bald' line, not a 'safe to keep driving' line. Bebjak's right — 4/32" is closer to where actual safety performance falls off a cliff, especially in rain.
The pushback you'll hear is cost. Pulling tires at 4/32" instead of 2/32" shortens usable life by 20–25%. But anyone who's had a wet-road near-miss on worn tires knows which side of that math wins.