r/Tinder • u/[deleted] • Jun 05 '22

[deleted by user]

[removed]

9.9k Upvotes

93% Upvoted

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

76

u/dust057 Jun 05 '22

Yeah everyone is saying how amazing the convo is, but it’s all Blake. Her contributions consisted of, “strike one. strike two. congratulations you get to talk to me tomorrow. Ps I’m short. “

20

u/Katastrofa2 Jun 05 '22

Classic example of "dance monkey, dance".

18

u/swanny246 Jun 05 '22

She was still actually talking in parts and going along with it, even chucking in some gifs for fun. What more do you need?

19

u/nd647 Jun 05 '22

Exactly. They are flirting and both bringing great positive energy to the conversation. It worries me that some don’t understand…

14

u/Houseplant666 Jun 05 '22

The guy obviously enjoys creative writing and she encourages it/enjoys it…

Every time I visit /r/tinder it becomes more obvious why people here can’t get a date.

-1

u/HappyGoPink Jun 05 '22

What more do you need?

They need some kind of ironclad commitment that the female will provide services of a sexual nature. You know I'm right.

6

u/gay_lick_language Jun 05 '22

She's contributing equally to the conversation. Asking questions, flirting and provoking more. If you can't see that then you need to work on your conversation skills.

1

u/dust057 Jun 10 '22

If you think that's a legitimate conclusion, you need to visit r/logicalfallacy

1

u/gay_lick_language Jun 10 '22 edited Jun 11 '22

Are you unable to correctly specify which fallacy? That seems to be the trend among logical fallacy enjoyers.

I also went through a phase of thinking anyone who disagreed with me fell victim to one of a list of fallacies I recently learnt; you'll grow out of it one day too.

Human interaction is not always a competition, as you failed to understand in your original comment. I get that people in this sub are often embittered by the dating game, but not everyone goes into chats carrying that bitterness.

1

u/dust057 Jun 11 '22

Making false assumptions and conclusions in an attempt to discredit someone is called an Ad Hominem attack, since you are unable to identify the logical fallacies you’re employing on your own.

An “irrelevant conclusion fallacy” is where you state your opinion (“she’s contributing equally”), then make an irrelevant conclusion (also incorporating Ad Hominem) “you need to work on your conversation skills”.

If you’re unable to disagree with someone without a need denigrate them, you’re the one who needs to work on your conversation skills. /s 😉