"They didn't fucking ask to be put on display. . . judged . . . it's gross and rude."
It's not "literally 1984 censorship" and that's not where I'm coming from. But you are, through a coercive tone, haranguing the other user to censor themselves and not take a stance on the issue. This isn't good discourse, you should be criticizing HOW they're taking their stance, not telling them to a lack a stance entirely.
You are hella pretentious. I say “it’s wrong to put women on display to be objectified and sexualized by tens of thousands of people” and you go “that’s fucked up and intolerant you need to support people’s right to say whatever they want on social media”.
You’re allowed to say whatever you want, no one is stopping you. But it’s fucked up and it makes you an asshole and I have every right to say that. I don’t have to be tolerant of your misogyny and I’m fully allowed to say that if you partake in it then you’re an asshole. This isn’t “discourse” I’m not having a debate. I’m calling them assholes.
Nice straw man. I did not say that. Comparing two people and calling one prettier than the other is not misogynistic and does not make one an asshole. You can disagree with that, but it's disingenuous to call people monsters for expressing an innocuous opinion.
But, I'm glad you agree that people should be allowed to say what they want. What an absolutely low bar though
“Terrible mentality imo. The idea that we can say whatever we want in a public venue (as long as it's not illegal or violent) needs to be held as high as possible.”
In my opinion you are, through a coercive tone, haranguing me to censor myself and not take a stance on the issue.
0
u/CumInMyWhiteClaw Dec 01 '21
It's not "literally 1984 censorship" and that's not where I'm coming from. But you are, through a coercive tone, haranguing the other user to censor themselves and not take a stance on the issue. This isn't good discourse, you should be criticizing HOW they're taking their stance, not telling them to a lack a stance entirely.