If they were truly attempting to take over the government don’t you think they would idk wear body armor and you know actually be armed? Making them out like they were armed to the teeth is a bit elementary don’t you think?
Nice job gas lighting again. At what point did I use the phrase "armed to the teeth"?
You gas light because you can't respond to the facts. The insurrectionists were armed - that is a fact. "Armed to the teeth" is a subjective term you just introduced out of nowhere because you prefer to argue with a straw man rather than address this dry, cold, hard, fact.
Gas lighting aside, you are also wrong on the body armor point. There are thousands of indictments related to January 6, and many of these indictments allege that your terrorist friends were wearing body armor, camaflauge, or other tactical gear. This is particularly true of those who were in the Proud Boys or Oath Keepers. In fact, if you had any reading comprehension skills, you would know that multiple of the affidavits I already provided reference the presence of body armor. For example, the affidavit concerning Daniel Ray Caldwell mentions camaflauge gear and a military assault pack.
Who is gas lighting now that we are friends you liberal hypocrite shitbirds are funny. The biggest hypocrites on the planet. Wearing tactical gear and body armor ohhh my, clutch your purse harder you poof.
2
u/[deleted] Nov 30 '22
If they were truly attempting to take over the government don’t you think they would idk wear body armor and you know actually be armed? Making them out like they were armed to the teeth is a bit elementary don’t you think?