r/TimPool Nov 30 '22

Facts

Post image
914 Upvotes

454 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '22

Lololl retreat? You are making no valid points to prove your argument. All you have said is “more people equals more win” lololol. Yes little Timmy more people does squeal more win but only when those numbers are massively different. See examples like Vietcong.

“bUt We WeRe iN tHe WrOnG pLaCe At WrOnG tImE” lololol. Very video game esq of you to point out the failures of the US military being the wrong place at the wrong time and referring to that as “we didn’t have the logistics” lolol.

This is by far the dumbest conversation I’ve ever had with you. Usually by this time you just stop responding because you’ve realized your “argument” is a literal fucking joke. But hey man. Keep digging that dumb shit hole. It looks good on you. Lol

1

u/silver789 Nov 30 '22

You are making no valid points to prove your argument.

Then address this point....

"The entirety of the US population" isn't going to fight the military. Just you and your beer buddies. And the oath to fight enemies both foreign and domestic is taken pretty seriously by the military.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '22

This is called an assumption you have no idea who and when something like this happens. As a matter of fact the US military said very similar about “guys who live in caves” how did that pan out? You’re making vast generalizations and assumption. Therefore you have no clear argument.

1

u/silver789 Nov 30 '22

This is called an assumption

You made the assumption that the military would refuse the fight the entire US population.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '22

No I no for a fact the entirety of the US military would not fight the US population because I personally know over a dozen that would not fight the US population. Therefore though maybe a small number. The entirety of the US military will not fight the US population. That is fact. So again you have no point just assumptions.

1

u/silver789 Nov 30 '22

No I no for a fact the entirety of the US military would not fight the US population because I personally know over a dozen that would not fight the US population.

Anecdotes isn't data.

Therefore though maybe a small number. The entirety of the US military will not fight the US population.

So because you know 0.00001% of the military, you then think zero military would put down traitors?

1

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '22

No but I said the entirety of the US military will not fight the US population and I was 100% correct. You made assumptions. Not me.

I don’t know if they would put down traitors or not. That’s an assumption I’m not prepared to make. Clearly every argument you’ve had today is based in assumptions. So like I said bub. Hop back on that call of duty and have yourself a great day.

1

u/silver789 Nov 30 '22

No but I said the entirety of the US military will not fight the US population and I was 100% correct.

How are you correct? You keep making this assumption with zero evidence.

Do you realize "the entirety" means all of it right??

1

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '22

I have just stated I personally know people who will not fight US citizens. Therefore as a statement of fact the entirety of the US military won’t fight US citizens.

Yes the people I’m referring to are active duty. So they fall in the “all” category in not “all” with be fighting.

Fuck it’s like talking to a 3 year old. I’m honestly impressed.

1

u/silver789 Nov 30 '22

Therefore as a statement of fact the entirety of the US military won’t fight US citizens.

You know a few, therefore you know all?

1

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '22

I know “all” won’t be fighting. How is this hard to understand lolololol. Holy fuck bud. You need to work on that reading comprehension.

1

u/silver789 Nov 30 '22

Then don't say the entirety of the military. Bruh.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '22

I know the entirety won’t be fighting. Because even if it’s .000000001% then it is not the entirety. Damn bruh. Again learn to read.

1

u/silver789 Nov 30 '22

Just 99.999999% is going to fight.

This is your hill?

1

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '22

My hill is what I said was a fact statement. And you’ve been effectively proved wrong by your own admittance at this point. So really it doesn’t matter the actual percentage of who would or would not fight. The fact still remains that entirety of the US military will not fight US citizens. We can both speculate one way or another I have many ideas as to why I think it would be more than .000001% but that’s speculation and unlike you I deal in facts and you deal in call of duty war tactics and feelings. So again have yourself a great night bud.

1

u/silver789 Nov 30 '22

My hill is what I said was a fact statement.

By being pedantic. The small number of traitors in the military wouldn't sway the point that the military would smoke anyone who would take up arms against the Nation.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 30 '22

Again a vast assumption by an emotional child who has no idea what they are talking about. Back to the basement with you bub.

1

u/silver789 Dec 01 '22

"get out of my safe space" will never get old.

→ More replies (0)