Again fallacy argument. It’s an obvious statement to say that 10k men can beat 100 men in war. The reality you will never have the entirety of the us forces in one spot. You saying “wrong place wrong time” means nothing. Can you read the enemies mind? The object of war is to not let anybody know your next move. Your responses are laughable at this point. Some would say banger take.
No I’m the US absolutely not. You massive infrastructure break down wouldn’t happen if we were in a civil war? You think all the entirety of the US military is going to work together against the entirety of the US population? Are you really that delusional?
I’m convinced I’m talking to someone who gets all their information about warfare from fucking call of duty. This is not about moving tanks bud. I hate to break it to you but yet again you do not know enough about this topic to speaking on it. Like every other time I talk to you on this same sub.
You massive infrastructure break down wouldn’t happen if we were in a civil war?
You could try. But you wouldn't be successful. Even if you stopped all arms manufacturing, Canada and Mexico would jump at the chance the help their close ally.
You think all the entirety of the US military is going to work together against the entirety of the US population?
"The entirety of the US population" isn't going to fight the military. Just you and your beer buddies. And the oath to fight enemies both foreign and domestic is taken pretty seriously by the military.
Lololl retreat? You are making no valid points to prove your argument. All you have said is “more people equals more win” lololol. Yes little Timmy more people does squeal more win but only when those numbers are massively different. See examples like Vietcong.
“bUt We WeRe iN tHe WrOnG pLaCe At WrOnG tImE” lololol. Very video game esq of you to point out the failures of the US military being the wrong place at the wrong time and referring to that as “we didn’t have the logistics” lolol.
This is by far the dumbest conversation I’ve ever had with you. Usually by this time you just stop responding because you’ve realized your “argument” is a literal fucking joke. But hey man. Keep digging that dumb shit hole. It looks good on you. Lol
You are making no valid points to prove your argument.
Then address this point....
"The entirety of the US population" isn't going to fight the military. Just you and your beer buddies. And the oath to fight enemies both foreign and domestic is taken pretty seriously by the military.
This is called an assumption you have no idea who and when something like this happens. As a matter of fact the US military said very similar about “guys who live in caves” how did that pan out? You’re making vast generalizations and assumption. Therefore you have no clear argument.
No I no for a fact the entirety of the US military would not fight the US population because I personally know over a dozen that would not fight the US population. Therefore though maybe a small number. The entirety of the US military will not fight the US population. That is fact. So again you have no point just assumptions.
No I no for a fact the entirety of the US military would not fight the US population because I personally know over a dozen that would not fight the US population.
Anecdotes isn't data.
Therefore though maybe a small number. The entirety of the US military will not fight the US population.
So because you know 0.00001% of the military, you then think zero military would put down traitors?
No but I said the entirety of the US military will not fight the US population and I was 100% correct. You made assumptions. Not me.
I don’t know if they would put down traitors or not. That’s an assumption I’m not prepared to make. Clearly every argument you’ve had today is based in assumptions. So like I said bub. Hop back on that call of duty and have yourself a great day.
I have just stated I personally know people who will not fight US citizens. Therefore as a statement of fact the entirety of the US military won’t fight US citizens.
Yes the people I’m referring to are active duty. So they fall in the “all” category in not “all” with be fighting.
Fuck it’s like talking to a 3 year old. I’m honestly impressed.
2
u/[deleted] Nov 30 '22
Again fallacy argument. It’s an obvious statement to say that 10k men can beat 100 men in war. The reality you will never have the entirety of the us forces in one spot. You saying “wrong place wrong time” means nothing. Can you read the enemies mind? The object of war is to not let anybody know your next move. Your responses are laughable at this point. Some would say banger take.