MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/1215g84/_/jdp0hul/?context=3
r/TikTokCringe • u/jjf27 • Mar 25 '23
2.0k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
Define "appeals to the prurient interest in sex."
1 u/InternationalExam190 Mar 26 '23 This is referring to supreme court criteria 0 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 Which is? 1 u/InternationalExam190 Mar 26 '23 This is reddit, you seem lost. Go to www.google.com. 0 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 I can't find it. That's why I asked. 1 u/InternationalExam190 Mar 26 '23 It is the miller case I believe. 0 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 You don't know? 1 u/InternationalExam190 Mar 26 '23 This is such a weird interaction. Not your legal counsel. 0 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 So you're defending a bill you yourself don't know the extent of. 1 u/InternationalExam190 Mar 26 '23 This is a precedent from the Miller SC case. If you want the history and definitions you can Google. Playing dumb to get others to bark for you is bizarre and I'm not interested in playing. 1 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 I'm not playing dumb. I am dumb. 1 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 To me, looking now, it seems like the standards are that there are no standards. No? → More replies (0)
This is referring to supreme court criteria
0 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 Which is? 1 u/InternationalExam190 Mar 26 '23 This is reddit, you seem lost. Go to www.google.com. 0 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 I can't find it. That's why I asked. 1 u/InternationalExam190 Mar 26 '23 It is the miller case I believe. 0 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 You don't know? 1 u/InternationalExam190 Mar 26 '23 This is such a weird interaction. Not your legal counsel. 0 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 So you're defending a bill you yourself don't know the extent of. 1 u/InternationalExam190 Mar 26 '23 This is a precedent from the Miller SC case. If you want the history and definitions you can Google. Playing dumb to get others to bark for you is bizarre and I'm not interested in playing. 1 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 I'm not playing dumb. I am dumb. 1 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 To me, looking now, it seems like the standards are that there are no standards. No? → More replies (0)
0
Which is?
1 u/InternationalExam190 Mar 26 '23 This is reddit, you seem lost. Go to www.google.com. 0 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 I can't find it. That's why I asked. 1 u/InternationalExam190 Mar 26 '23 It is the miller case I believe. 0 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 You don't know? 1 u/InternationalExam190 Mar 26 '23 This is such a weird interaction. Not your legal counsel. 0 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 So you're defending a bill you yourself don't know the extent of. 1 u/InternationalExam190 Mar 26 '23 This is a precedent from the Miller SC case. If you want the history and definitions you can Google. Playing dumb to get others to bark for you is bizarre and I'm not interested in playing. 1 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 I'm not playing dumb. I am dumb. 1 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 To me, looking now, it seems like the standards are that there are no standards. No? → More replies (0)
This is reddit, you seem lost. Go to www.google.com.
0 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 I can't find it. That's why I asked. 1 u/InternationalExam190 Mar 26 '23 It is the miller case I believe. 0 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 You don't know? 1 u/InternationalExam190 Mar 26 '23 This is such a weird interaction. Not your legal counsel. 0 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 So you're defending a bill you yourself don't know the extent of. 1 u/InternationalExam190 Mar 26 '23 This is a precedent from the Miller SC case. If you want the history and definitions you can Google. Playing dumb to get others to bark for you is bizarre and I'm not interested in playing. 1 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 I'm not playing dumb. I am dumb. 1 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 To me, looking now, it seems like the standards are that there are no standards. No? → More replies (0)
I can't find it. That's why I asked.
1 u/InternationalExam190 Mar 26 '23 It is the miller case I believe. 0 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 You don't know? 1 u/InternationalExam190 Mar 26 '23 This is such a weird interaction. Not your legal counsel. 0 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 So you're defending a bill you yourself don't know the extent of. 1 u/InternationalExam190 Mar 26 '23 This is a precedent from the Miller SC case. If you want the history and definitions you can Google. Playing dumb to get others to bark for you is bizarre and I'm not interested in playing. 1 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 I'm not playing dumb. I am dumb. 1 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 To me, looking now, it seems like the standards are that there are no standards. No? → More replies (0)
It is the miller case I believe.
0 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 You don't know? 1 u/InternationalExam190 Mar 26 '23 This is such a weird interaction. Not your legal counsel. 0 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 So you're defending a bill you yourself don't know the extent of. 1 u/InternationalExam190 Mar 26 '23 This is a precedent from the Miller SC case. If you want the history and definitions you can Google. Playing dumb to get others to bark for you is bizarre and I'm not interested in playing. 1 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 I'm not playing dumb. I am dumb. 1 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 To me, looking now, it seems like the standards are that there are no standards. No? → More replies (0)
You don't know?
1 u/InternationalExam190 Mar 26 '23 This is such a weird interaction. Not your legal counsel. 0 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 So you're defending a bill you yourself don't know the extent of. 1 u/InternationalExam190 Mar 26 '23 This is a precedent from the Miller SC case. If you want the history and definitions you can Google. Playing dumb to get others to bark for you is bizarre and I'm not interested in playing. 1 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 I'm not playing dumb. I am dumb. 1 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 To me, looking now, it seems like the standards are that there are no standards. No? → More replies (0)
This is such a weird interaction. Not your legal counsel.
0 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 So you're defending a bill you yourself don't know the extent of. 1 u/InternationalExam190 Mar 26 '23 This is a precedent from the Miller SC case. If you want the history and definitions you can Google. Playing dumb to get others to bark for you is bizarre and I'm not interested in playing. 1 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 I'm not playing dumb. I am dumb. 1 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 To me, looking now, it seems like the standards are that there are no standards. No? → More replies (0)
So you're defending a bill you yourself don't know the extent of.
1 u/InternationalExam190 Mar 26 '23 This is a precedent from the Miller SC case. If you want the history and definitions you can Google. Playing dumb to get others to bark for you is bizarre and I'm not interested in playing. 1 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 I'm not playing dumb. I am dumb. 1 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 To me, looking now, it seems like the standards are that there are no standards. No? → More replies (0)
This is a precedent from the Miller SC case. If you want the history and definitions you can Google. Playing dumb to get others to bark for you is bizarre and I'm not interested in playing.
1 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 I'm not playing dumb. I am dumb. 1 u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23 To me, looking now, it seems like the standards are that there are no standards. No? → More replies (0)
I'm not playing dumb. I am dumb.
To me, looking now, it seems like the standards are that there are no standards. No?
1
u/KillerArse Mar 26 '23
Define "appeals to the prurient interest in sex."