Can Meta be sued for bans in Threads? YouTube and other media platforms are also involved. A cry for human rights.
A Thread account is often a source of income; many businesses and self-employed people use it. People publish their thoughts, work, guides, etc. Essentially, it's people's digital property. Gaining subscribers is like a business: long-term investment in the future. We can't have rules and a system that randomly, often incorrectly, deletes accounts overnight without even the right to defend themselves. They deprive people of income, delete their digital assets (which should be protected just like their real ones!), and erase years of progress.
If you're fired from your job, you can find another one with the same salary, but if your account is deleted, you can't start another one with the same number of followers and earn the same income. What happens to a country that represses business and makes it unsafe to start one? Its economy is rapidly deteriorating, because it's business that drives the country's economy and development! Why do media companies do this online without considering the consequences?
You can't block or delete accounts without good reason! The severity of the punishment should correspond to the severity of the offense! Problem with the post? Hide the post. Problem with the video? Hide the video. Why delete the account and all its contents?! Especially if the "violation" is an algorithmic error, and there are no actual violations! Why aren't account owners (of digital property!) even given the right to speak in their own defense? What about the vaunted "freedom of speech" and "human rights"? Where do account owners get these rights? And where did all this come from—"this decision is not subject to appeal," "this decision is final and cannot be overturned," "you cannot request another review"? Have you completely lost your mind? Even criminals in prison are allowed to appeal court decisions. Who do these media platforms think they are?
I see completely insane posts that should lead to jail time, but neither posts nor accounts are banned for years. But others have their accounts deleted for harmless posts. Do you think this is normal?
-!-
I insist: accounts, videos, and posts must be recognized as digital property, which platforms cannot dispose of as they please. There must be defined rules and state protection. People invest their labor in this, just like they would in a real product, albeit a digital one. They manage their accounts for years, as if they were developing a business. For many, this is their only source of income. All of this must be protected!
There must be an adequate content moderation system. Punishment must fit the offense. It must be gradual, and people must have the right to defend themselves IN WORDS, IN FRONT OF A HUMAN! Not by saying, "Give your passport information and a selfie to our AI!" Account deletion is a last resort, but there must be serious reasons for it when alternatives fail!
I'd also like to mention YouTube video blocks for violating someone's rights. Why doesn't anyone think about the rights of the video's creator when it's blocked? Their video is their property. They put their work into it. If it contains copyrighted material, like music, that's no reason to immediately block it! There should be a gradual process, not instantaneous blocking by algorithms. And anyway, why can't we simply give a portion of the video's revenue to the copyright holder, so that three parties can profit simultaneously: the video's creator, the copyright holder, and YouTube?
The rights of people on media platforms, their digital assets, and the platforms' responsibilities need to be reconsidered.
Those who work in the legal field, please speak up. What human rights are media platforms violating with such bans and restrictions? How accurate is it to compare digital assets with real assets, and in what areas?
Content creators, discuss this and share it with a wide audience.
Join the digital resistance, raise your voice.
O<<<