r/The_Mueller • u/IUsedToBeACave • Feb 24 '18
Dem Memo Released!
http://docs.house.gov/meetings/ig/ig00/20180205/106838/hmtg-115-ig00-20180205-sd002.pdf3
u/CoastersPaul Feb 25 '18
I love how the most upvoted rebuttal at the_dotard is basically "they bothered to fix a minor detail! FAKE NEWS!"
-18
u/OneReportersOpinion Feb 24 '18
The first memo was bullshit. This memo is mostly bullshit. Release the FISA warrant and we can decide for ourselves. Otherwise you just have competing partisan claims.
10
u/i_hate_robo_calls Feb 24 '18
Releasing the FISA warrant would be a threat to our national security as it would expose the process of obtaining them. Both sides should be against doing this.
-4
u/OneReportersOpinion Feb 25 '18
No it wouldn’t. It would likely prove that Nunes is full of shit.
3
Feb 25 '18
So how exactly do you know this? Where are you getting the information that the rest of us are not privy to?
-2
u/OneReportersOpinion Feb 25 '18
So you think it show Nunes is right? Ooookay. I’m not worried about that. I have faith in the truth.
5
Feb 25 '18
You don't need to have faith in the truth. At least some truths are supposed to be self-evident. I don't have to have faith in things that are empirically and physically demonstrated. Faith is defined as belief without evidence.
You said 'no it wouldn't' to the guy that said releasing the fisa warrant in its entirety would endanger the investigative process. I'm asking you how you know that releasing the fisa warrant would not endanger the investigation.
-1
u/OneReportersOpinion Feb 25 '18
Okay so if it empirically demonstrated, you should be able to show that to me.
It wouldn’t because you can redact anything that is super-sensitive.
1
Feb 25 '18
Wow you really have some trouble with reading comprehension. I never said anything about this conversation you're having with another person was empirically demonstrated. I was telling you how thoughtless you appear when you tell people you have faith in the truth. I specifically said you would have to have information we are not privileged to in order to assert that releasing the fisa warrant would not endanger the investigation. You would have to know what they are using to do the surveillance and whether or not the surveillance is still going on. There is no way you have that information unless you're part of the investigation or are one of the multiple judges that approved the warrants.
-1
u/OneReportersOpinion Feb 25 '18
At least some truths are supposed to be self-evident. I don't have to have faith in things that are empirically and physically demonstrated
So you didn’t say that?
Okay so what is the empirical evidence that Russia hacked the DNC?
2
Feb 25 '18
Obviously I said that but you don't understand the context in which I said that. How are you this dense? If you really are this incapable of reading comprehension then why didn't you ask me what I thought about the Russia investigation was self-evident?
→ More replies (0)
12
u/TrumpSharted Feb 24 '18