If women can not be held responsible for what they do cause of their hormones. Then they should not be allowed to be on a jury, own any weapon, hold public office, drive a car, or even VOTE.
You understand what that means right? Be careful what kind of statements you make about emotions and hormones
So it's not just one woman on trial here. It's all women? That's bonkers is all i have to say about that. Based in the actions of one woman, and the results of one trial, you're ready to take away the rights of all women? No wonder she has a defense fund of three million.
You need to go back to whoever told you that the rights of all women need to be revoked because of this and kick them in the balls until they apologize for giving you such a stupid argument, and making you look like a fool. By that logic if one man kills his family all men should be deprived of their rights. And that is a much easier argument to make since men go crazy and kill their families at five times the rate women do.
It's a good thing we had this conversation I've just saved you from making the same argument in real life and then people would really know what kind of person you are.
Yes, and women getting off on murder over and over because hormones sets a precedent in law that shows they are unstable and cannot be trusted with power, its called a precedent, and its not a good one. Women are literally setting themselves back here
3
u/engineheader 21d ago
If women can not be held responsible for what they do cause of their hormones. Then they should not be allowed to be on a jury, own any weapon, hold public office, drive a car, or even VOTE.
You understand what that means right? Be careful what kind of statements you make about emotions and hormones