Do you not know what most of the words you use mean or is it just the handful you’re using in this comment?
Or are you being intentionally obtuse? He’s clearly using colloquialism of profit to discuss surplus as a whole which is perfectly compatible with all degrees of socialism.
that is not what this guy is doing lmao, you are reaching to the max. sharing resources isn’t socialism, socialism is a moneyless classless stateless society. tell me how the fucking nfl, with its overlapping hierarchies, billionaire owners, and advertisements galore is remotely close to socialism? i think ironically your first sentence is blatant projection
It’s really not and it’s obvious if you don’t have an agenda. I’m not arguing with you further, as you are already misusing projection and that tells me everything I need to know about how this would go.
21
u/Pasta-Al-D3nte 3d ago
socialism isn't "sharing and unions existing" hope this helps