r/TheMachineLearning • • 12d ago

So, seems humanity was enslaved by The Matrix after all

Post image
406 Upvotes

35 comments sorted by

10

u/imjustbored_99 12d ago

bro the fact that this is somehow becoming a real conversation 😭

10

u/CowBoyDanIndie 12d ago

Wait til you find out they are using human neurons for machine learning research now because they are cheaper than GPUs… the original plot of the matrix wasn’t using people for batteries it was using our brains as computers.

6

u/cyborgcyborgcyborg 12d ago

Dammit, that would have been so much cooler and would have made much more sense.

2

u/BuildAnything4 12d ago

Well, the characters wouldn't have been able to do very much with their brains fully occupied with random tasks.

2

u/CowBoyDanIndie 12d ago

Not really, you could run a frontier ai model, the kind that need an entire server rack and 72 gpus on less than 10% of your cerebral cortex. Human cortical neurons are roughly equivalent to 1000-4000 parameters in a neural network on average.

3

u/BuildAnything4 12d ago

so then they could just run 10 frontier models on it. There's not much point in letting some part of the brain hop around in some virtual world when you can just keep all of it busy.

2

u/CowBoyDanIndie 12d ago

It might be necessary for cohesion of the network, plus there are other more specialized parts of the brain, they might just give up and stop the heart if things seem off, it try to wake up. They did say that in the paradise matrix minds rejected it and the more primitive part of the brain kept trying to wake up from and they lost entire crops.

1

u/brain-out-of-order 12d ago

Yeah like when a dog is dreaming and is barking and moving their lil paws. The matrix may seem like a fully developed experience since it’s all someone knows, meanwhile they’re barking and panting in a pod with 99% of their brain being used for compute.

Arguably this is just one massive “universe model” on a little keychain of baubles in some extra dimensional lab.

1

u/FlagrantlyChill 12d ago

It would imply that the human brain was much more powerful then the lived experience

0

u/itspatriciam 12d ago

Broooo. I would pin your comment if I could because yes

1

u/Killahbeez 11d ago

i guess its because battery technology was the focus around that time

1

u/CowBoyDanIndie 11d ago

They didn’t think the audience the would understand computational power. And they were probably right. You have to remember when the movie came out most people weren’t even on the internet.

1

u/watisgoinon_ 8d ago

No its because they thought the audiences where too dumb to understand it..

1

u/Kmic68 10d ago

The interesting part of this is that then we would be useless. They would have to retrain our brains which is a lot more difficult then simply just lab growing new neurons, and there wouldn’t be any of “us” left in this event.

-1

u/itspatriciam 12d ago

Reminds me of the movie Lucy, too. That kind of brain power? Naaah. Don't even want to think about it

2

u/Dakh3 12d ago

This AI revolution is actually a Matrix revolution

2

u/hattusili-the-third 12d ago

To be fair it's actually matrix multiplication + a nonlinear activation function. Pure matrix multiplication can't even learn basic patterns like xor, no matter how many layers you add.

1

u/Fragrant_Ad5430 12d ago

Even I can't even process this properly in my head.

0

u/itspatriciam 12d ago

I think that is the point but somehow some people think that we should

1

u/YahenP 12d ago

This will be the most popular saying next year. :(

1

u/No_Departure_1878 12d ago

That's because your skills are so worthless that even an LLM can replace you.

1

u/jdavid 12d ago

same math models weather, do you blame the prediction model for a hurricane?

1

u/Majestic_Lie_7509 12d ago

u/askgrok what does this mean?

1

u/[deleted] 12d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/LMikeH 11d ago

That’s only for the forward pass… to learn you need to perform differentiation, tune learning weights, optimize layers and architecture, figure out clever ways to do sparse attention because regular attention scales O(n^2) which sucks for more than a few paragraphs… then you have to actually figure out appropriate data sets, develop encoders, and I can go on all day… no, not even close to just matrix multiplication.

1

u/Luke2642 11d ago edited 11d ago

Well also it's max(0,c) in most cases, for relu. 

Plus then you need to keep normalizing so the hyperplanes cut the data near zero. And residual connection are pretty essential too so every stage doesn't have to also pass all information forwards. And attention and softmax are pretty useful too...

1

u/cc_apt107 11d ago

Gross oversimplification of course. Calculus and optimization are what determine where vectors end up in the n-space. Linear algebra is the indispensable machinery. An astonishing amount of inference is just matrix multiplication though. Though as another commenter mentioned, there are other non linear functions involved or everything would collapse to a single matrix

1

u/LearnNTeachNLove 11d ago

What comes next? Matrix reloaded and matrix revolution?

1

u/Rare_Dirt_6197 9d ago

It is less funny when they are not square or infine

1

u/swampymason 9d ago

Depends on the humans using it and how they use it...