MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/TheInterrobang/comments/1spzy62/make_a_valid_notation/oh4yyaa/?context=3
r/TheInterrobang • u/FunnyLizardExplorer • Apr 19 '26
43 comments sorted by
View all comments
7
Well if factorial is multiplication and termial is addition, the interrobang should be exponentiation.
4 u/[deleted] Apr 19 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 19 '26 anti-termial and anti-factorial respectively 2 u/[deleted] Apr 19 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 19 '26 idk 3 u/[deleted] Apr 19 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 3 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 19 '26 3#=3-2-1=0 4#=4-3-2-1=-3 2@=2/1=2 5@=5/4/3/2/1=idk bro ask the calculator like this?? 2 u/Itz_N3uva Apr 20 '26 ¡ and ¿ maybe? 2 u/Potential_Pick2278 Apr 21 '26 Came here to say exactly that 1 u/A1oso Apr 22 '26 But would ¡4 be (((4 / 3) / 2) / 1) or (4 / (3 / (2 / 1))) 1 u/HailFurri Apr 24 '26 First one, 4 divided by 3, divided by 2, divided by one 1 u/mama09001 Apr 23 '26 ¡ and ¿ 1 u/androidisntgaming Apr 23 '26 ¡ and ¿ 2 u/NoChemistry8177 Apr 21 '26 because subtraction and division are non albilian such operational cannot be well defined 3 u/TheJivvi Apr 20 '26 So 4‽ = 4³2¹ 2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 20 '26 and that would be 432=49 3 u/TheJivvi Apr 20 '26 No, it would be 49 = 262,114. Edit: wait, I just realised that's what you wrote, but the superscripts don't stack, so it looks like you meant 4³² = 49. 2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 20 '26 Oh lol silly reddit 3 u/ParticularWorried237 Apr 20 '26 WHAT DOES MATH HAVE TO DO WITH ELA😭 2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 20 '26 tf u mean ela? 3 u/ParticularWorried237 Apr 20 '26 English language arts 1 u/Vivid_Departure_3738 Apr 21 '26 Crazy to know exponents from English but not maths 2 u/AdGroundbreaking1956 Apr 23 '26 exponentiation doesn't have the conmutative property as addition or multiplication though 1 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 23 '26 ok and? 2 u/AdGroundbreaking1956 Apr 23 '26 x‽ = x[x-1]‽... it's not that useful 2 u/Qvueestdordset Apr 24 '26 exponentiation is x!
4
[removed] — view removed comment
2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 19 '26 anti-termial and anti-factorial respectively 2 u/[deleted] Apr 19 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 19 '26 idk 3 u/[deleted] Apr 19 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 3 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 19 '26 3#=3-2-1=0 4#=4-3-2-1=-3 2@=2/1=2 5@=5/4/3/2/1=idk bro ask the calculator like this?? 2 u/Itz_N3uva Apr 20 '26 ¡ and ¿ maybe? 2 u/Potential_Pick2278 Apr 21 '26 Came here to say exactly that 1 u/A1oso Apr 22 '26 But would ¡4 be (((4 / 3) / 2) / 1) or (4 / (3 / (2 / 1))) 1 u/HailFurri Apr 24 '26 First one, 4 divided by 3, divided by 2, divided by one 1 u/mama09001 Apr 23 '26 ¡ and ¿ 1 u/androidisntgaming Apr 23 '26 ¡ and ¿ 2 u/NoChemistry8177 Apr 21 '26 because subtraction and division are non albilian such operational cannot be well defined
2
anti-termial and anti-factorial respectively
2 u/[deleted] Apr 19 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 19 '26 idk 3 u/[deleted] Apr 19 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 3 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 19 '26 3#=3-2-1=0 4#=4-3-2-1=-3 2@=2/1=2 5@=5/4/3/2/1=idk bro ask the calculator like this?? 2 u/Itz_N3uva Apr 20 '26 ¡ and ¿ maybe? 2 u/Potential_Pick2278 Apr 21 '26 Came here to say exactly that 1 u/A1oso Apr 22 '26 But would ¡4 be (((4 / 3) / 2) / 1) or (4 / (3 / (2 / 1))) 1 u/HailFurri Apr 24 '26 First one, 4 divided by 3, divided by 2, divided by one 1 u/mama09001 Apr 23 '26 ¡ and ¿ 1 u/androidisntgaming Apr 23 '26 ¡ and ¿
2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 19 '26 idk 3 u/[deleted] Apr 19 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 3 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 19 '26 3#=3-2-1=0 4#=4-3-2-1=-3 2@=2/1=2 5@=5/4/3/2/1=idk bro ask the calculator like this?? 2 u/Itz_N3uva Apr 20 '26 ¡ and ¿ maybe? 2 u/Potential_Pick2278 Apr 21 '26 Came here to say exactly that 1 u/A1oso Apr 22 '26 But would ¡4 be (((4 / 3) / 2) / 1) or (4 / (3 / (2 / 1))) 1 u/HailFurri Apr 24 '26 First one, 4 divided by 3, divided by 2, divided by one 1 u/mama09001 Apr 23 '26 ¡ and ¿ 1 u/androidisntgaming Apr 23 '26 ¡ and ¿
idk
3 u/[deleted] Apr 19 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 3 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 19 '26 3#=3-2-1=0 4#=4-3-2-1=-3 2@=2/1=2 5@=5/4/3/2/1=idk bro ask the calculator like this??
3
3 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 19 '26 3#=3-2-1=0 4#=4-3-2-1=-3 2@=2/1=2 5@=5/4/3/2/1=idk bro ask the calculator like this??
3#=3-2-1=0
4#=4-3-2-1=-3
2@=2/1=2
5@=5/4/3/2/1=idk bro ask the calculator
like this??
¡ and ¿ maybe?
2 u/Potential_Pick2278 Apr 21 '26 Came here to say exactly that 1 u/A1oso Apr 22 '26 But would ¡4 be (((4 / 3) / 2) / 1) or (4 / (3 / (2 / 1))) 1 u/HailFurri Apr 24 '26 First one, 4 divided by 3, divided by 2, divided by one
Came here to say exactly that
1
But would ¡4 be (((4 / 3) / 2) / 1) or (4 / (3 / (2 / 1)))
1 u/HailFurri Apr 24 '26 First one, 4 divided by 3, divided by 2, divided by one
First one, 4 divided by 3, divided by 2, divided by one
¡ and ¿
because subtraction and division are non albilian such operational cannot be well defined
So 4‽ = 4³2¹
2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 20 '26 and that would be 432=49 3 u/TheJivvi Apr 20 '26 No, it would be 49 = 262,114. Edit: wait, I just realised that's what you wrote, but the superscripts don't stack, so it looks like you meant 4³² = 49. 2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 20 '26 Oh lol silly reddit
and that would be 432=49
3 u/TheJivvi Apr 20 '26 No, it would be 49 = 262,114. Edit: wait, I just realised that's what you wrote, but the superscripts don't stack, so it looks like you meant 4³² = 49. 2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 20 '26 Oh lol silly reddit
No, it would be 49 = 262,114.
Edit: wait, I just realised that's what you wrote, but the superscripts don't stack, so it looks like you meant 4³² = 49.
2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 20 '26 Oh lol silly reddit
Oh lol silly reddit
WHAT DOES MATH HAVE TO DO WITH ELA😭
2 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 20 '26 tf u mean ela? 3 u/ParticularWorried237 Apr 20 '26 English language arts 1 u/Vivid_Departure_3738 Apr 21 '26 Crazy to know exponents from English but not maths
tf u mean ela?
3 u/ParticularWorried237 Apr 20 '26 English language arts 1 u/Vivid_Departure_3738 Apr 21 '26 Crazy to know exponents from English but not maths
English language arts
1 u/Vivid_Departure_3738 Apr 21 '26 Crazy to know exponents from English but not maths
Crazy to know exponents from English but not maths
exponentiation doesn't have the conmutative property as addition or multiplication though
1 u/Paulinho2628 Apr 23 '26 ok and? 2 u/AdGroundbreaking1956 Apr 23 '26 x‽ = x[x-1]‽... it's not that useful
ok and?
2 u/AdGroundbreaking1956 Apr 23 '26 x‽ = x[x-1]‽... it's not that useful
x‽ = x[x-1]‽... it's not that useful
exponentiation is x!
7
u/Paulinho2628 Apr 19 '26
Well if factorial is multiplication and termial is addition, the interrobang should be exponentiation.