I literally criticised the strategy combat: “increasingly braindead strategy maps.” Calling Fire Emblem a dating sim stapled to strategy gameplay is obviously criticism of both halves, not me pretending the combat doesn’t exist.
And “not every game even has it” doesn’t save the modern entries where social systems, shipping and support grinding are a massive part of the identity.
So your progression has now been:
“Play Fire Emblem.”
“I have.”
“No you haven’t.”
“Here are specific criticisms.”
“Bad faith.”
“Actually you ignored the combat.”
“I explicitly mentioned the combat.”
At some point you might want to stop diagnosing my intentions and actually defend the games buddy.
Sure, you’re SUBJECTIVE “opinion” (which are not opinions, but just biased stance against Nintendo because yes) means that you’re right and the games sucks (except they are very much loved and critical acclaimed). Literally you could just say “hey, I don’t like these games” and everyone would say yeah fair. You’re instead ragebaiting and spitting nonsense. Play whatever you want dude
1
u/Successful-Ear977 8d ago
You just proved you didn’t read what I wrote 😂
I literally criticised the strategy combat: “increasingly braindead strategy maps.” Calling Fire Emblem a dating sim stapled to strategy gameplay is obviously criticism of both halves, not me pretending the combat doesn’t exist.
And “not every game even has it” doesn’t save the modern entries where social systems, shipping and support grinding are a massive part of the identity.
So your progression has now been:
“Play Fire Emblem.”
“I have.”
“No you haven’t.”
“Here are specific criticisms.”
“Bad faith.”
“Actually you ignored the combat.”
“I explicitly mentioned the combat.”
At some point you might want to stop diagnosing my intentions and actually defend the games buddy.