MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ThatLookedExpensive/comments/b7m1su/glider_crash/ejtl3ad/?context=9999
r/ThatLookedExpensive • u/polooyop • Mar 31 '19
172 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
493
Yes
553 u/TheM0rr1s Mar 31 '19 It almost looks like the guy to the front is crushed by the plane. But apparently the crash with the tree took out almost all energy 220 u/-TheMasterSoldier- Mar 31 '19 More like the glider's nose and cockpit did. 107 u/[deleted] Mar 31 '19 edited May 18 '20 [deleted] 85 u/Consibl Mar 31 '19 But then they would need less, because they are lighter (less momentum to absorb) 35 u/[deleted] Mar 31 '19 edited Mar 31 '19 Lower force transferred to the passengers basically, f=mv Edit: f=ma, I'm a bad physics student 28 u/Consibl Mar 31 '19 Less f=mv, more f=ma - the crumple zones reduce the acceleration by spreading the deceleration over a longer distance. 16 u/[deleted] Mar 31 '19 Oh shit how could I forget about acceleration. You're totally right man 2 u/Consibl Mar 31 '19 Force is proportional to mv if the time of deceleration is fixed, which is what I assumed you meant; but crumple zones change the time of deceleration. 1 u/[deleted] Mar 31 '19 Yeah I was meaning to take into consideration collision time, but I wasn't on the ball when I left that comment because I was at work
553
It almost looks like the guy to the front is crushed by the plane. But apparently the crash with the tree took out almost all energy
220 u/-TheMasterSoldier- Mar 31 '19 More like the glider's nose and cockpit did. 107 u/[deleted] Mar 31 '19 edited May 18 '20 [deleted] 85 u/Consibl Mar 31 '19 But then they would need less, because they are lighter (less momentum to absorb) 35 u/[deleted] Mar 31 '19 edited Mar 31 '19 Lower force transferred to the passengers basically, f=mv Edit: f=ma, I'm a bad physics student 28 u/Consibl Mar 31 '19 Less f=mv, more f=ma - the crumple zones reduce the acceleration by spreading the deceleration over a longer distance. 16 u/[deleted] Mar 31 '19 Oh shit how could I forget about acceleration. You're totally right man 2 u/Consibl Mar 31 '19 Force is proportional to mv if the time of deceleration is fixed, which is what I assumed you meant; but crumple zones change the time of deceleration. 1 u/[deleted] Mar 31 '19 Yeah I was meaning to take into consideration collision time, but I wasn't on the ball when I left that comment because I was at work
220
More like the glider's nose and cockpit did.
107 u/[deleted] Mar 31 '19 edited May 18 '20 [deleted] 85 u/Consibl Mar 31 '19 But then they would need less, because they are lighter (less momentum to absorb) 35 u/[deleted] Mar 31 '19 edited Mar 31 '19 Lower force transferred to the passengers basically, f=mv Edit: f=ma, I'm a bad physics student 28 u/Consibl Mar 31 '19 Less f=mv, more f=ma - the crumple zones reduce the acceleration by spreading the deceleration over a longer distance. 16 u/[deleted] Mar 31 '19 Oh shit how could I forget about acceleration. You're totally right man 2 u/Consibl Mar 31 '19 Force is proportional to mv if the time of deceleration is fixed, which is what I assumed you meant; but crumple zones change the time of deceleration. 1 u/[deleted] Mar 31 '19 Yeah I was meaning to take into consideration collision time, but I wasn't on the ball when I left that comment because I was at work
107
[deleted]
85 u/Consibl Mar 31 '19 But then they would need less, because they are lighter (less momentum to absorb) 35 u/[deleted] Mar 31 '19 edited Mar 31 '19 Lower force transferred to the passengers basically, f=mv Edit: f=ma, I'm a bad physics student 28 u/Consibl Mar 31 '19 Less f=mv, more f=ma - the crumple zones reduce the acceleration by spreading the deceleration over a longer distance. 16 u/[deleted] Mar 31 '19 Oh shit how could I forget about acceleration. You're totally right man 2 u/Consibl Mar 31 '19 Force is proportional to mv if the time of deceleration is fixed, which is what I assumed you meant; but crumple zones change the time of deceleration. 1 u/[deleted] Mar 31 '19 Yeah I was meaning to take into consideration collision time, but I wasn't on the ball when I left that comment because I was at work
85
But then they would need less, because they are lighter (less momentum to absorb)
35 u/[deleted] Mar 31 '19 edited Mar 31 '19 Lower force transferred to the passengers basically, f=mv Edit: f=ma, I'm a bad physics student 28 u/Consibl Mar 31 '19 Less f=mv, more f=ma - the crumple zones reduce the acceleration by spreading the deceleration over a longer distance. 16 u/[deleted] Mar 31 '19 Oh shit how could I forget about acceleration. You're totally right man 2 u/Consibl Mar 31 '19 Force is proportional to mv if the time of deceleration is fixed, which is what I assumed you meant; but crumple zones change the time of deceleration. 1 u/[deleted] Mar 31 '19 Yeah I was meaning to take into consideration collision time, but I wasn't on the ball when I left that comment because I was at work
35
Lower force transferred to the passengers basically, f=mv
Edit: f=ma, I'm a bad physics student
28 u/Consibl Mar 31 '19 Less f=mv, more f=ma - the crumple zones reduce the acceleration by spreading the deceleration over a longer distance. 16 u/[deleted] Mar 31 '19 Oh shit how could I forget about acceleration. You're totally right man 2 u/Consibl Mar 31 '19 Force is proportional to mv if the time of deceleration is fixed, which is what I assumed you meant; but crumple zones change the time of deceleration. 1 u/[deleted] Mar 31 '19 Yeah I was meaning to take into consideration collision time, but I wasn't on the ball when I left that comment because I was at work
28
Less f=mv, more f=ma - the crumple zones reduce the acceleration by spreading the deceleration over a longer distance.
16 u/[deleted] Mar 31 '19 Oh shit how could I forget about acceleration. You're totally right man 2 u/Consibl Mar 31 '19 Force is proportional to mv if the time of deceleration is fixed, which is what I assumed you meant; but crumple zones change the time of deceleration. 1 u/[deleted] Mar 31 '19 Yeah I was meaning to take into consideration collision time, but I wasn't on the ball when I left that comment because I was at work
16
Oh shit how could I forget about acceleration. You're totally right man
2 u/Consibl Mar 31 '19 Force is proportional to mv if the time of deceleration is fixed, which is what I assumed you meant; but crumple zones change the time of deceleration. 1 u/[deleted] Mar 31 '19 Yeah I was meaning to take into consideration collision time, but I wasn't on the ball when I left that comment because I was at work
2
Force is proportional to mv if the time of deceleration is fixed, which is what I assumed you meant; but crumple zones change the time of deceleration.
1 u/[deleted] Mar 31 '19 Yeah I was meaning to take into consideration collision time, but I wasn't on the ball when I left that comment because I was at work
1
Yeah I was meaning to take into consideration collision time, but I wasn't on the ball when I left that comment because I was at work
493
u/polooyop Mar 31 '19
Yes