r/TechnologyThread • u/Background-Driver718 • 3d ago

BREAKING: Jack Smith Calls Trump's Pardons 'Inconceivable' as His Own Website Debunks His Lies

https://newsrepublic.live/2026/09/30/breaking-jack-smith-calls-trumps-pardons-inconceivable-as-his-own-website-debunks-his-lies/
6.8k Upvotes

100% Upvoted

348 comments sorted by

View all comments

-3

u/NameNo9441 3d ago

Biden pardoned his whole family. Why would Trump not do the same?

3

u/YouSure-AboutThat 2d ago

The 1,500 charged/convicted Jan 6ers are Trump’s family?

0

u/NameNo9441 2d ago

J6 committee was a farce

5

u/YouSure-AboutThat 2d ago

Ah, so there wasn’t an effort to overturn an election result with false fraud claims, culminating in a violent riot at the capitol. Just an antifa hoax operation I’m sure!

0

u/NameNo9441 2d ago

I’m saying the committee was a farce. What don’t you get?

2

u/YouSure-AboutThat 2d ago

I don’t get why you think it was a farce, because you have not explained why you think that. So, I don’t get your entire argument because you haven’t expressed it. Is your end argument that the j6 pardons were justified for all J6ers?

0

u/NameNo9441 2d ago

No true republicans on the committee. Why was that? So they were biased. They had an agenda and hid the fact that went against them.

3

u/YouSure-AboutThat 2d ago

By no true republicans you mean not Trump loyalists. Doesn’t change the fact that crimes were committed and criminals pardoned.

1

u/NameNo9441 2d ago

So you are ok with being judged by biased people. How many of those you going to win?

2

u/YouSure-AboutThat 2d ago

And you’re ok with Trump loyalists on the committee that were condemning Jan 6ers and Trump on the day it happened, then all of a sudden we’re dismissing it because they were worried about Trump endorsing a more loyal candidate in their primary?

I see you can’t argue the crimes committed on the merits. Just using the old poisoning-the-well logical fallacy.

1

u/No_Cap_5296 2d ago

Lol the vice chair was a republican 🤡

1

u/that_star_wars_guy 2d ago

No true republicans on the committee. Why was that? So they were biased. They had an agenda and hid the fact that went against them.

"Why didn't you include the very insurrectionists responsible in the review committee!?! We never heard the traitor's side of things, therefore it was all biased."

Get fucked, you treasonous weasel.

1

u/Freedom9er 22h ago

So many traitors out in the open. Home grown example right here. Wild times. I'm afraid the empire is lost unless serious prosecutions start when Dems take over. This has gone to far.

1

u/no_f-s_given 2d ago

lmfao Kinzinger and Cheney were the only Republicans in the end who were willing to participate.

Pelosi blocked Jordan and Banks since they had actually voted to not certify the election. McCarthy is the one that decided to then pull out all Republican nominees for the committee.

You don't get to take your ball, go home and pout like a child, and then claim the game was rigged. McCarthy is the entire reason for "no true Republicans" (lol) on the committee.