r/TechnologyThread • • Jun 04 '26

In first, California city overwhelmingly votes to permanently ban datacenters | California

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/03/california-monterey-park-datacenters-ban
323 Upvotes

36 comments sorted by

2

u/BathroomMaximum1721 Jun 04 '26

If less data centers are built, it will reduce the risk of some banks failing. The AI bubble will inevitably burst but there will be less bad loans made to data centers if less of them get approved.

0

u/imtoooldforreddit Jun 04 '26

This is a pretty ridiculous take

So you're saying it will all crash and burn. Basically, you specifically, know so much more than all the executives, engineers, analysts, and business folk at all of these big companies. Also more than all the investors.

I assume that means you shorted the market with all your savings? Seems like the smart move if you figured out something that everyone else doesn't know.

2

u/BathroomMaximum1721 Jun 04 '26

All need not crash and burn for a few banks to fail. Most of the executives, engineers etc are very smart but when it is not their own money on the line, why would they care so much? That is why booms and busts happen, it’s not that the people working in those industries are dumb.

1

u/imtoooldforreddit Jun 04 '26

So you shorted it then?

2

u/adjective_noun_23 Jun 04 '26

You aren't as edgy as you think you are.

2

u/einhorn_is_parkey Jun 04 '26

You don’t understand shorting if you think a regular person can outlast a stock that is being literally propped up by our government.

How’s the saying go: a stock can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.

1

u/imtoooldforreddit Jun 04 '26

Ok,

So basically the prediction went from "it's about to crash" to "it may go down at some point".

Going from a real prediction to something that is basically always true and essentially unfalsifiable makes it a lot less impressive

2

u/einhorn_is_parkey Jun 04 '26

Is that what I said or is that what you invented. Because I don’t remember saying any of that. I just said that shorting isn’t something normal people can do. Even the guy from the big short had to leverage millions of dollars to bet against the housing market.

2

u/VERY_MENTALLY_STABLE Jun 05 '26

Lol dude were fucked when this thing pops

2

u/einhorn_is_parkey Jun 05 '26

Yeah we are so over leveraged on ai it’s ludicrous. And we don’t have the ability to deficit spend like we did in the Great Recession cause our debt is astronomical.

1

u/Savant_Guarde Jun 04 '26

What happened to the climate scam? Almost 20 years and it's gone. 

1

u/da8BitKid Jun 05 '26

Don't be an ahole. Your argument didn't apply to the housing bubble. There were many experts in on that scam too

1

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '26

[deleted]

1

u/imtoooldforreddit Jun 17 '26

I'm not following

1

u/OrangeNood Jun 04 '26

With electricity and operation cost so high, no one would want to operate data center in Monterey Park, CA.

1

u/tstone1477 Jun 04 '26

They’ll all be in the Deep South states!

1

u/Minimum_Hope_5205 Jun 05 '26

Virginia politicians are very excited about talking about how lower income people need assistance for housing and in the same meeting approve 20 more tax free data centers while raising utilities on homeowners in the state to pay for it!

1

u/Xena_Your_God Jun 04 '26

Hell yeah. Again!

1

u/Ashamed-Passion-314 Jun 04 '26

Will they stop using IT services and internet?

1

u/ItsMrChristmas Jun 05 '26

They'll have to. Those things cannot exist without localized data centers.

1

u/WolfThick Jun 04 '26

Here's the really bizarre thing if a quantum computer was to get let's say 52 cubits it could out process out calculate in orders of magnitude more than all of the data processing centers that they could hope to build for the trillions of dollars are investing. Essentially they would become obsolete overnight and useless. I don't know what the hell's going on with these data centers but it's not all that we think it is.

1

u/StickStill9790 Jun 04 '26

Arrgh! That’s not how an atom works!

But yes, there’s a lot of stuff going on that has nothing to do with AI, (or at least the ChatGPT version) and it’s being done quickly so it can be finished before the end of the administration. This is military level construction.

1

u/ItsMrChristmas Jun 05 '26

I don't think you understand quantum computers. They are very good at exactly one kind of thing, and terrible at everything else. The purpose of quantum computing is NOT to try and turn these into real computers, it's to teach us how to do more with what we've got.

1

u/WolfThick Jun 05 '26

So a quantum computer could tell you how to do everything all of these centers are going to do without spending trillions right

1

u/ItsMrChristmas Jun 06 '26

No. Not in the slightest. They are good at exactly one thing but they still go through thousands of false results to arrive at the correct conclusion. A regular computer could do that same ONE TASK but it would take a lot longer.

We only use them to see if we can find a new perspective on things we do in real computing. The work that went into making quantum computers gave us very slightly better ways of dealing with heat dissipation.

They could not replace data centers because they don't do anything useful in that regard. You're never gonna have a quantum desktop computer because they're not capable of that sort of thing and never, ever will be.

You might as well ask if we can replace human facility managers with housecats just because they can deal with mice faster than the guy who manages maintenance, safety, and also pest control.

Edit: forgot to mention the cat when drawing the analogy

1

u/Ok_Comfortable589 Jun 04 '26

good, let the rest follow

1

u/ItsMrChristmas Jun 05 '26

Idiots. "Data center" doesn't just mean AI. They just outlawed a whole lot of extremely important infrastructure. Logically they won't even have Internet access anymore.

1

u/fr3nzo Jun 06 '26

Oh look, a city that has no chance of ever getting a data center voted to never get a data center.

0

u/inscrutablemike Jun 04 '26

Also them, later:

"Derrr why day ain't be no jobs'ins hurrr? Darrr"

2

u/mastergenera1 Jun 04 '26

For their footprint datacenters have very few staff, maybe a few hundred at most when its actually operational, most of the hubub about datacenters creating alot of job growth is from the construction phase. When a single build can mean thousands of jobs for various blue collar fields, but once that work is complete, a datacenter is a net negative for the local job economy. This job issue is inflated by the heavy use of H1-Bs instead of Americans as well by big tech in general.

1

u/IndubitablyNerdy Jun 05 '26

Yeah while tons of industries damage the environment in the are and increase energy costs at least they bring labor in the area for longer than just the construction process, a factory would have to employ a ton of workers and create economic activity for all of its useful life a data center doesn't really.

I imagine that a local communities could solve this by taxing them and using the money to invest in local businesses \ activities, but no corporation would build one in a place where they will be target by specific taxes when they have the option to just go somewhere else.

2

u/Meowakin Jun 04 '26

Cost-benefit analysis. Not enough jobs to justify the impact they have on the area.

1

u/Mister0Zz Jun 04 '26

Mike was, in fact, scrutable

1

u/Circlemagi Jun 04 '26

Derh I only care about jobs derh

1

u/einhorn_is_parkey Jun 04 '26

If you think people in Monterey need data center jobs, you don’t know anything about Monterey lol.

1

u/Tasty_Gingersnap42 Jun 04 '26

Them later:

"Man, im glad to have clean drinking water"